Lauren1985

Maliscious Report Warning System

36 posts in this topic

Is there anyway that us ladies could have a maliscious report warning system. I fully realise that we are able to rebutal a maliscious report but currently as far as Im aware we can only rebutal a report once its writen and quite often it can take a day or two for a rebutal to be published.

Surely if a man is able to write a maliscious report and we ladies are aware its coming we should have the right to write a rebutal to publish with the report itself.

Prime example today and I have to admit the first time I have dealt with the use of a report as a threat. The client who's parting words where, "just you wait, Im going to write a hell of a viscous report about you, you will never get to see another client again". Now if a client has a bad experience they of course have the right to write about it but it shouldnt be used as a threat and surely we should have the right to defend ourselves at the time and not become threatened or victimised because of such threats.

The incident was during a 30 minute appointment at a cost of £80. The client asked the girl to confirm services including OWO and she politely explained that she would only offer OW unless he wished to shower. She was more than happy to offer OWO if he did this however he had an obvious body odour scent and who can blame her asking him to shower. The client refused the shower and chose to go ahead with the session.

Half way through the appointment and in the middle of a covered oral session the client insisted on oral without as it was not working for him. The girl politely explained again that he would need to shower before she offered oral without to which the client got up and demanded his money back. The girl gave him £60 back, which I consider to be more than fair but he then became rude and agresive threatening that he would write a bad report on her if she didnt give him all his money back. The client was very threatening and despite her more than fair offer she gave him the last £20 back as he was so rude to her she just wanted to get rid of him.

Now weather a bad report would have or even will now follow remains to be seen, the guy got his money back so there shouldnt be one however he was so viscoius in his final threats we really dont know. It was the clients decision to go ahead with the appointment with OW and the clients descision not to shower yet the poor girl was bullied into offering a partial free service under threat of a bad report.

Its not the first time I have heard of this sort of thing although it is the first time I have dealt with it myself and have even heard horror stories about girls offering full services before such threats are made. A simple report warning system should soon put a stop to such threats carying any weight but can we have the ability to submit a rebutal before a report is published

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know, you can always email Galahad and tell him that a negative/malicious report might be fortcomming. Whatever he will decide to publish it outright, its a matter of his decision depending, but at least he will know the circumstances of it. If you let him know about this report after its published, it will be to late. The most you can do then: its to write rebuttal.

I still don't understand why the girl decided to proceed with an appointment, when a simple request to client to have a shower was declined. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Name and shame the idiot.......whats wrong with the lady using this or some other board to say this, and use names etc, so that other parlours and escorts know about his actions.

No need to wait for him to post a bad report, maybe a thread or section about guys who dont behave could be beneficial if it was open for all to view.

Edited by TartanTam
because I wanted too change a few things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Name and shame the idiot.......whats wrong with the lady using this or some other board to say this, and use names etc, so that other parlours and escorts know about his actions.

No need to wait for him to post a bad report, maybe a thread or section about guys who dont behave could be beneficial if it was open for all to view.

Like the dangerous punters section

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lauren, I agree girls do need something more, I do not think that the rebutal system works. In common with some other readers of these pages I often read in not recommended reports, once read I will remember it if it is on a girl in my area, but even if the girl then writes a rebutal how do those who have already read the report know? It isn't indicated that there is a rebutual in the list of F.Rs! A girl I know socially, but not as a working girl had a nasty report which knowing her just could not be true; and another I do know as a w.g. had a very nasty report which was nasty, detailing services and times she did not provide. However, this one was removed by Sir G. I therefore agree that a right of reply is in no way adequate when a report is untrue and/or maliscious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anyway that us ladies could have a maliscious report warning system. I fully realise that we are able to rebutal a maliscious report but currently as far as Im aware we can only rebutal a report once its writen and quite often it can take a day or two for a rebutal to be published.

Surely if a man is able to write a maliscious report and we ladies are aware its coming we should have the right to write a rebutal to publish with the report itself.

Prime example today and I have to admit the first time I have dealt with the use of a report as a threat. The client who's parting words where, "just you wait, Im going to write a hell of a viscous report about you, you will never get to see another client again". Now if a client has a bad experience they of course have the right to write about it but it shouldnt be used as a threat and surely we should have the right to defend ourselves at the time and not become threatened or victimised because of such threats.

The incident was during a 30 minute appointment at a cost of £80. The client asked the girl to confirm services including OWO and she politely explained that she would only offer OW unless he wished to shower. She was more than happy to offer OWO if he did this however he had an obvious body odour scent and who can blame her asking him to shower. The client refused the shower and chose to go ahead with the session.

Half way through the appointment and in the middle of a covered oral session the client insisted on oral without as it was not working for him. The girl politely explained again that he would need to shower before she offered oral without to which the client got up and demanded his money back. The girl gave him £60 back, which I consider to be more than fair but he then became rude and agresive threatening that he would write a bad report on her if she didnt give him all his money back. The client was very threatening and despite her more than fair offer she gave him the last £20 back as he was so rude to her she just wanted to get rid of him.

Now weather a bad report would have or even will now follow remains to be seen, the guy got his money back so there shouldnt be one however he was so viscoius in his final threats we really dont know. It was the clients decision to go ahead with the appointment with OW and the clients descision not to shower yet the poor girl was bullied into offering a partial free service under threat of a bad report.

Its not the first time I have heard of this sort of thing although it is the first time I have dealt with it myself and have even heard horror stories about girls offering full services before such threats are made. A simple report warning system should soon put a stop to such threats carying any weight but can we have the ability to submit a rebutal before a report is published

If he wouldnt have a shower and smelt then you should have shown him the door. End of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anyway that us ladies could have a maliscious report warning system. I fully realise that we are able to rebutal a maliscious report but currently as far as Im aware we can only rebutal a report once its writen and quite often it can take a day or two for a rebutal to be published.

Surely if a man is able to write a maliscious report and we ladies are aware its coming we should have the right to write a rebutal to publish with the report itself.

Prime example today and I have to admit the first time I have dealt with the use of a report as a threat. The client who's parting words where, "just you wait, Im going to write a hell of a viscous report about you, you will never get to see another client again". Now if a client has a bad experience they of course have the right to write about it but it shouldnt be used as a threat and surely we should have the right to defend ourselves at the time and not become threatened or victimised because of such threats.

The incident was during a 30 minute appointment at a cost of £80. The client asked the girl to confirm services including OWO and she politely explained that she would only offer OW unless he wished to shower. She was more than happy to offer OWO if he did this however he had an obvious body odour scent and who can blame her asking him to shower. The client refused the shower and chose to go ahead with the session.

Half way through the appointment and in the middle of a covered oral session the client insisted on oral without as it was not working for him. The girl politely explained again that he would need to shower before she offered oral without to which the client got up and demanded his money back. The girl gave him £60 back, which I consider to be more than fair but he then became rude and agresive threatening that he would write a bad report on her if she didnt give him all his money back. The client was very threatening and despite her more than fair offer she gave him the last £20 back as he was so rude to her she just wanted to get rid of him.

Now weather a bad report would have or even will now follow remains to be seen, the guy got his money back so there shouldnt be one however he was so viscoius in his final threats we really dont know. It was the clients decision to go ahead with the appointment with OW and the clients descision not to shower yet the poor girl was bullied into offering a partial free service under threat of a bad report.

Its not the first time I have heard of this sort of thing although it is the first time I have dealt with it myself and have even heard horror stories about girls offering full services before such threats are made. A simple report warning system should soon put a stop to such threats carying any weight but can we have the ability to submit a rebutal before a report is published

Name and shame the man.

Also put him on your blacklist so that none of your girls ever have to deal with him again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree she should have shown him the door. That said I have seen clients I have considered to be borderline before because if I didnt I would be a booking down, its a harsh truth but an honest one. If a client is happy with oral with then Im protected from urgh, lets not go there, but if a client insisted on OWO I would show them the door, its about compromise and the girl thought the compromise had been met, no shower, stinky man o with and a good long shower for her after :-p

His name was Dan, well thats the name he used and his number was 07**9 588491. He isnt sufficient for the dangerous punter board and many girls have been knocked down for using that board for light offenses.

He is on our blacklist now and I will email galahad to let him know about a possible report. I dont even know if its plausable but a system where girls could log a potential maliscious report warning so that if one was submitted it would send up a flag to be reviewed, at least someone could then make a decision weather to publish or not based on both sides and publish the report with the origional email from the girl so the reader could make thier own mind up. I dont know anyone that goes back to read negative reports twice to check for rebutals and maliscious reports can be damaging for a girl. This girl has other posative reports but even so I have no doubt that any negative report would make someone think twice even if its later deleted its still been read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like the dangerous punters section

NO! That was nothing like a dangerous punter. That was merely a rude and obnoxious punter.

In the same way that punters can open threads on here criticising WGs for their service as well as writing FRs, ladies can issue rebuttals which are attached to the actual FR and also put up a thread here if they so wish providing they stick to facts.

In this type of case, it would not be unreasonable for the lady/establishment to await an FR, then to use the FR writer's FR Name and start a thread here with no further identifying details, where they then state the threats of writing a poor FR based upon the facts as they saw them. Then it is down to which side gets believed.

The Dangerous Punters section is, as has been correctly stated, for actually dangerous people and needs not to be devalued by this sort of thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to point out the obvious, Galahad and the moderation team have an absolute zero tolerance policy where the promise of a good report or the threat of a bad report is used to gain discounts, favours or anything else. Behaviour such as that can lead to a ban and the removal of all field reports previously posted.

If any lady is approached in this way please let one of us know, because if we don't know about it we can't help. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anyway that us ladies could have a maliscious report warning system. I fully realise that we are able to rebutal a maliscious report but currently as far as Im aware we can only rebutal a report once its writen and quite often it can take a day or two for a rebutal to be published.

Surely if a man is able to write a maliscious report and we ladies are aware its coming we should have the right to write a rebutal to publish with the report itself.

Prime example today and I have to admit the first time I have dealt with the use of a report as a threat. The client who's parting words where, "just you wait, Im going to write a hell of a viscous report about you, you will never get to see another client again". Now if a client has a bad experience they of course have the right to write about it but it shouldnt be used as a threat and surely we should have the right to defend ourselves at the time and not become threatened or victimised because of such threats.

The incident was during a 30 minute appointment at a cost of £80. The client asked the girl to confirm services including OWO and she politely explained that she would only offer OW unless he wished to shower. She was more than happy to offer OWO if he did this however he had an obvious body odour scent and who can blame her asking him to shower. The client refused the shower and chose to go ahead with the session.

Half way through the appointment and in the middle of a covered oral session the client insisted on oral without as it was not working for him. The girl politely explained again that he would need to shower before she offered oral without to which the client got up and demanded his money back. The girl gave him £60 back, which I consider to be more than fair but he then became rude and agresive threatening that he would write a bad report on her if she didnt give him all his money back. The client was very threatening and despite her more than fair offer she gave him the last £20 back as he was so rude to her she just wanted to get rid of him.

Now weather a bad report would have or even will now follow remains to be seen, the guy got his money back so there shouldnt be one however he was so viscoius in his final threats we really dont know. It was the clients decision to go ahead with the appointment with OW and the clients descision not to shower yet the poor girl was bullied into offering a partial free service under threat of a bad report.

Its not the first time I have heard of this sort of thing although it is the first time I have dealt with it myself and have even heard horror stories about girls offering full services before such threats are made. A simple report warning system should soon put a stop to such threats carying any weight but can we have the ability to submit a rebutal before a report is published

Hi honi, that's terrible. Hope the girl in question is ok. I totally agree with what your saying here- also with what Steve have said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is ok, understandably concerned he will act on his threat and pissed off he was so nasty, I couldnt believe his language on the phone but Im just grateful he left without causing any more fuss than he already had. Lessons learnt, he wont get the chance again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like he's already posted a negative report.

What a twat i have to say i've punted keeley before when she was a substitute for another girl and she does do owo which was rather good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like he's already posted a negative report.

What a twat i have to say i've punted keeley before when she was a substitute for another girl and she does do owo which was rather good.

This is just the sort of support the lady needs. Unfortunately the readersgip of this board is probably much less than that of the FRs therefor has reduced effect in countering the damage. Much better if loyal supporters write positive FRs. provided they have not reported previously on the same lady.

I wonder whether it would be practicable to devise a system whereby trusted members of this board who have recent knowledge of a lady subjected to a very damaging FR could collectively support her. They could write to Gallahad giving something like a character reference and the rebuttal could make reference to this, maybe without naming the referees.

I would add only to be employed in extreme cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like he's already posted a negative report.

What a twat i have to say i've punted keeley before when she was a substitute for another girl and she does do owo which was rather good.

Is it 95652? Amounts seem to match but the description certainly doesn't - website advert does advertise CIM - but not OWO so is that CIM but with a condom?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a negative/malicious report might be fortcomming

Can we please not have the idea of a negative FR confused and conflated with that of a malicious one? It's hard enough trying to warn people about bad service from certain WGs who evidently believe themselves untouchable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like he's already posted a negative report.

What a twat i have to say

I rather think he knows more about the punt than you, thanks all the same :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rebutal submitted, its just now a case of waiting until its published. The gentleman is being blatenly vindictive, the comment about Cloud 9 I thought an amusing one, we are not cloud 9 although I can fully understand the confusion, call it a re incarnation with new management :-). I can hardly see that Cloud 9 needed to change its name? In fact if Sasha had been willing to sell the business I would have rather liked to keep it :-)

Keeley has a great reputation in this and other area's. If the cloud 9 reports had not been removed it would be easy to see this for what it was, a twat of a client acting on a threat despite getting the full refund as he demanded. The guy was a twat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also dont get why he said it was a hotel, it was at our flat. Its also strange that he says she threatened a bloke being next door yet he states a hotel room, Im sure there would have been potentially loads of blokes next door if it had been a hotel, not that any would have been likely to come running :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately arseholes exist everywhere. We all bump into them in all walks of life. Hope the girl concerned isn't dwelling on it. It is his only report so I wouldn't judge a girl on that. I hope she gets some positive reports soon to redress things.

I hope you referred to this thread on the forum in your rebuttal, as it predates his report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see where you are coming from, but there is always two sides to each story.

If G removes all FR's that are claimed to be malicious, whats to stop every lady who thinks they will get a bad FR or have got a bad FR, making a claim and getting the bad FR removed?

There are ladies out there who would expliot this and then pick and chose which reports get deleted.

I was under the impression that its all or nothing when it comes to FR's.

Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad, and if this lady has more positive FR's that negative, then surely any punter reseaching into visiting this lady will be able to to see that it was a one off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another site that we tend not to mention, both "sides" can write reports and if a lady is totally crap, she can ensure that if a Punter says anything at all bad about her, she can ensure he never gets seen by anyone else there by giving him atrocious feedback.

Neither that system, nor ours here on Punternet is at all perfect but I think the "One bite of the cherry each" rule works well.

If a girl has say 12 really good FRs and 1 poor one then punters researching will take that one as a blip or personality clash.

I think a sensible and balanced rebuttal actually says a lot more about the lady in question than a vitriolic one.

In this case a reference to having seen this one coming, in the rebuttal, and referring to this thread, would be a clincher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad feedback on ** doesn't necessarily mean no-one will see a guy again. I've seen profiles with mixed feedback and other ladies have seen guys I've left notes about. Most decent ladies will use their own judgement and in cases I've seen most accept the booking but heed the warnings. Unfortunately my experience is that often guy then subsequently starts to behave as in the negative reports, at that point I'm afraid that yes most will be put of seeing him - but that is only fair enough since it could be fool hardy to continue.

My conclusion is most decent ladies will give chaps a chance but there are those[chaps] out there who just continually behave like prats so we need to keep aware of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where people behave badly on anything they build up a rep.

Some systems allow balance and others can be rigged, from what I saw there two years ago, theirs was rigged so the punter was at a disadvantage, I trust is has improved since and you seem to indicate it is better now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now