Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Lollipop

Intelligence... why dont cops highlight the nice brothels

39 posts in this topic

Bit of intelligence.

How about the cops highlighting which parlours etc have girls who are not controlled and happy to be there so people can go there and not to any nasty ones and no arresting...

Also kinda starves the scumbags etc, and builds relationships between nice brothels and cops which would get the girls there protection from cops to keep out the scum whilst getting better business and pulling it away from the scum>?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without meaning to generalise, do you think the words 'Intelligence' and 'Cops' should be used in the same thread?

However, I do think it is important that the Cops should treat WGs well, I have heard some good things in the past!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny you should mention this as I had this discussion with a serving police officer the other day.

Basically the rank and file wouldn't have a problem with this but as the police are basically controlled by whichever political party are in power then they 'political puppets' and are gagged as to what they can say in public.

Ask any Local Intelligence Officer off the record about safe brothels, you'd get a true account of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bit of intelligence.

How about the cops highlighting which parlours etc have girls who are not controlled and happy to be there so people can go there and not to any nasty ones and no arresting...

Possibly because ALL brothels are illegal, the police may turn a blind eye but they are unlikely to advertise them. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bit of intelligence.

How about the cops highlighting which parlours etc have girls who are not controlled and happy to be there so people can go there and not to any nasty ones and no arresting...

Also kinda starves the scumbags etc, and builds relationships between nice brothels and cops which would get the girls there protection from cops to keep out the scum whilst getting better business and pulling it away from the scum>?

Unfortunately if the new law gets in just being in a parlour will mean your controlled and the punters can be arrested.. It may even mean that now. The law of controlling has nothing to do with beaig there willingly of your own free will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Without meaning to generalise, do you think the words 'Intelligence' and 'Cops' should be used in the same thread?

However, I do think it is important that the Cops should treat WGs well, I have heard some good things in the past!

Its not the cops who are making this law is it... Its our lady friends in London. HH and JS. I do not think you should blame policemen and women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Funny you should mention this as I had this discussion with a serving police officer the other day.

Basically the rank and file wouldn't have a problem with this but as the police are basically controlled by whichever political party are in power then they 'political puppets' and are gagged as to what they can say in public.

Ask any Local Intelligence Officer off the record about safe brothels, you'd get a true account of things.

They have been ok in Luton with all the girls I know. But when they are told to act because of complaints they have no choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not the cops who are making this law is it... Its our lady friends in London. HH and JS. I do not think you should blame policemen and women.

I wasn't blaming the Police for these proposals, in fact some up high have shown opposition towards them, I just don't 'generally' like the Police force. That does not mean to say all are bad!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id be amazed if the law was changed to be honest. Every day someone is being stabbed to death or shot and they do nothing about that. Crime is pretty much running wild and they want to nick people for having a shag! The police are becoming little more than traffic wardens with cars. If you look at the thread on the young girl who was murdered in stoke because the place she worked was closed down and she worked the street, it may be worth showing how smiths plans are likely to pan out rather than the crap she spouts about protecting girls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Id be amazed if the law was changed to be honest. Every day someone is being stabbed to death or shot and they do nothing about that. Crime is pretty much running wild and they want to nick people for having a shag! The police are becoming little more than traffic wardens with cars. If you look at the thread on the young girl who was murdered in stoke because the place she worked was closed down and she worked the street, it may be worth showing how smiths plans are likely to pan out rather than the crap she spouts about protecting girls.

ROFL!! :)

The police are under huge pressure to increase the conviction rate. Every officer has a personal target on the number of successful arrests/convictions they need to produce. No doubt you've seen the latest "Careless Driving" proposals when you will be handed a £60 fine and three points; these include such dire offences as eating whilst driving; arguing with your passenger or changing a CD whilst driving. The sole reason for these is to increase convictions for minor offences whilst things such as burglaries will remain (as they are now) almost totally undetected.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/3919223/Motorists-face-60-fines-and-three-points-on-licence-for-minor-accidents.html

When we turn to legislation about punting; here's a gift for the police. Brothels don't move; they are easy to find (just look at this site) and any punter therein becomes an easy hit for a conviction. My guess is that if this legislation is enacted alot of punters will be offered cautions if found in a massage parlour. Result - a successful arrest/conviction and no paperwork other than the embarrassment of having your photo/DNA/fingerprints taken and becoming a criminal! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Id be amazed if the law was changed to be honest. Every day someone is being stabbed to death or shot and they do nothing about that. Crime is pretty much running wild and they want to nick people for having a shag!

And for hunting a fox, smoking a fag, etc. etc.

If you employ 650 people to come up with new laws, come up with new laws they will!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recently in the baby P case initially SocServcies (SS) came out to the media with a graph showing how the SS organisation performed.

Thats it

Their all in to meeting targets and producing data on the same thing.

And it that which the police will operate.

simple in it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ROFL!! :rolleyes:

The sole reason for these is to increase convictions for minor offences whilst things such as burglaries will remain (as they are now) almost totally undetected.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/3919223/Motorists-face-60-fines-and-three-points-on-licence-for-minor-accidents.html

D

I think you are missing the other major reason for this type of policing, which is to raise revenues for both local and central government to waste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And for hunting a fox, smoking a fag, etc. etc.

If you employ 650 people to come up with new laws, come up with new laws they will!

The anti hunting legislation, whether you agree with its stated aims or not, was an unjust and incompetently drafted law, passed only through the misuse of the provisions of the Parliament Act. There are strong arguments to suggest that the legislation to ban smoking in public places was draconian and excessive.

As the majority of Chief Constables of rural police forces acknowledged the hunting legislation is virtually unenforceable. The result? It is not enforced and to date there have only been three prosecutions by the CPS,of which only one, which is pending appeal, was successful. Hunting continues much as it has always done. More people now hunt than ever before, and more people turned out to support the Boxing Day Meets than ever before.

What a waste of thousands of man hours and tens of millions of taxpayers pounds, which would have been better spent (or wasted!) on health, education and transport.

This corrupt, disingenuous, incompetent, petty minded, and vacillating government will be swept from power, and memory, long before hunting and punting cease to exist. Principle, intelligence and sense rarely seem to exist within the British political system these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The anti hunting legislation, whether you agree with its stated aims or not, was an unjust and incompetently drafted law, passed only through the misuse of the provisions of the Parliament Act. There are strong arguments to suggest that the legislation to ban smoking in public places was draconian and excessive.

As the majority of Chief Constables of rural police forces acknowledged the hunting legislation is virtually unenforceable. The result? It is not enforced and to date there have only been three prosecutions by the CPS,of which only one, which is pending appeal, was successful. Hunting continues much as it has always done. More people now hunt than ever before, and more people turned out to support the Boxing Day Meets than ever before.

What a waste of thousands of man hours and tens of millions of taxpayers pounds, which would have been better spent (or wasted!) on health, education and transport.

This corrupt, disingenuous, incompetent, petty minded, and vacillating government will be swept from power, and memory, long before hunting and punting cease to exist. Principle, intelligence and sense rarely seem to exist within the British political system these days.

Hence it would be so much better to be run by european countries ie Netherlands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you serious?

I have a horrible feeling that he is!! See some of his other posts if you want to be really worried:eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This corrupt, disingenuous, incompetent, petty minded, and vacillating government will be swept from power, and memory, long before hunting and punting cease to exist. Principle, intelligence and sense rarely seem to exist within the British political system these days.

The original Hunting Bill introduced by the government would have allowed hunting with hounds to continue under licence - it was an amendment by Tony Banks which changed the bill to an outright ban. The bill was passed in a free vote in the Commons. Many Conservative MPs, including Ann Widdecombe, also supported the ban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a horrible feeling that he is!! See some of his other posts if you want to be really worried:eek:

Yes serious... Why not...

who has bi lingual kids? them who has thick kids who barely know their own language... us

Who has massive teen pregancies leading to estate ghettos full of gang kids us

Who has low teen pregancy rates ? them

Who has better employee protection rules ? them

Who has higher standards of living?

them

Who has more open minded attiudes to sex? them

Who isn't Americas lap dog? The Netherlands and Europe

Which countries have the intelligence to have ecstacy testing stations in nightclubs? they do

Who has euthanasia? some european countires?

Who has healthier and better quality food? the europeans.

Who has certain technologies before we do? they do

When they want to do a fuel protest they operate as one and win.

When aged 12 which countires have highly educated kids sex wise who would nit bat an eyelid as full on explict videos on how people masterbate?

The likes of the Netherlands seeing it as simply part of life. whilst its the ignorant and fearful who worry and slag off europe under some delusion that we are better.

GET REAL !!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a horrible feeling that he is!! See some of his other posts if you want to be really worried:eek:

Seeing as this is a site on prostition... ok this is an example of why Im smarter then you bowspirit.

Not poluted with delusions like nationalisim...

Ie can tell that the likes of

www.fkk-oase.de german fkk clubs are somewhat better then some crappy half derilict semi legal massage parlour

And its far better all above board with a nice place for the girls to work.

Like wise when europe tells us to clean up our beaches Im not stupid enough to complain that europe wants to take over as I like the idea of not swimming past your raw sewage poop

Likewise would prefer to have food clear of dodgy chemicals like when europe says we cant use them or improve the environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was passed in the Commons but the Lords voted against it. And a lot of Labour lords voted against it. It was only made law by the government using the Parliament act. And just why was it made illegal???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it was passed in the Commons but the Lords voted against it. And a lot of Labour lords voted against it. It was only made law by the government using the Parliament act. And just why was it made illegal???

Pleases religious types

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it was passed in the Commons but the Lords voted against it. And a lot of Labour lords voted against it. It was only made law by the government using the Parliament act. And just why was it made illegal???

Because the House of Commons passed the Bill, the Parliament Act of 1949 (the second Parliament Act after the original 1911 Act) limits the ability of the Lords to block legislation passed in the Commons, and when the Countryside Alliance appealed, the very same House of Lords upheld the 1949 Act.

It is quite right IMO that the democratically elected Commons has supremecy over the non-elected House Of Lords.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seeing as this is a site on prostition... ok this is an example of why Im smarter then you bowspirit.

Not poluted with delusions like nationalisim...

Ie can tell that the likes of

www.fkk-oase.de german fkk clubs are somewhat better then some crappy half derilict semi legal massage parlour

And its far better all above board with a nice place for the girls to work.

Like wise when europe tells us to clean up our beaches Im not stupid enough to complain that europe wants to take over as I like the idea of not swimming past your raw sewage poop

Likewise would prefer to have food clear of dodgy chemicals like when europe says we cant use them or improve the environment.

This drivel is incomprehensible. How can you debate with an imbecile?:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0