petitelucy

Scary report or fake 96008?

22 posts in this topic

Anyone read this negative report 96008 yet? Dont know the girl and not sticking up for her really, but he`s only done one report and says (QUOTE) "after a few days, went for a check up and an now HIV positive" WTF, Dont HIV only show up after 3 months or so. Am i being stupid or does this not ring true somehow?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure on the time scale for the test, but the one they do where you get instant results is for 3 months +, pretty sure 3 days isn't enough to show up at all though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Am i being stupid or does this not ring true somehow?

No I do not think you are being stupid. I'm not a doctor (of medicine or anything else) but I do not think that HIV will show up on a blood test for a lot longer than "a few days" - I just hope that the punter has the guts to go back to the WG in question and advise her that only a few days after seeing her (so, very probably already infectious) he tested HIV positive?

If one of a couple gets infected with HIV, then it seems generally understood that with the use of condoms, (femidom as well?) and being careful about blood, sex can continue between them.

Is casual sex, whether one-night-stand with a pick-up, or commercial, with a WG/Punter still OK for the HIV +? I'd rather incline to say, "No!" Once you test HIV + you need to switch to chess, or porno DVDs, but contact sex should be given up?

PS - Having read the FR - he did go back, to blame her. Not really too clever. "They have cameras", and didn't open the door so his communication was limited.

Sad story, BUT... I do not think he caught it from her.

Edited by Irgendeiner
Read the report!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HIV can show up in the blood after 10 days, however you do have to wait for 3 months to have a deffinate answer from the GUM clinic.

From what was said I have a few querys....

Did the gentlman see the lady more than once and this is how he knows it was her?

Did the gentleman have clear results before going to see the girl on the day? (and had not had sex with anyone else including his wife?)

Did the gentleman tell the girl he was HIV positive after he went back?

Can the gentleman prove that this girl gave him HIV, and if so he can sue, but if he can't it would be prudent to have a look at all the girls he had been with within a 6 months time frame, and contact them to get tested.

It is quite plausable and possible that the gentleman went into the appointment with HIV without knowing he had it and potentially passed it on.

Yes the results can show up in the prelim results(after 3 days) however you are requested that you wait 3 months to be absoluty sure.

Also, it is entirely possible that the clinic mixed up results, unlikey but possible as it has happened before.

Advice... suggest the FR writer return to the clinic and be 100% certian before he does anything silly.

Also the girl should be checked and if proved to have nothing the report should be taken down as this will ruin her trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had to laugh to myself, the guy spends half his short report describing the location and the girl. He might have had HIV before, but to claim the girl gave it to him is ridicoulous, what a joker!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone read this negative report 96008 yet? Dont know the girl and not sticking up for her really, but he`s only done one report and says (QUOTE) "after a few days, went for a check up and an now HIV positive" WTF, Dont HIV only show up after 3 months or so. Am i being stupid or does this not ring true somehow?

I read the report myself and thought exactly the same as you - I'm pretty sure that the results are through too quick to be real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone read this negative report 96008 yet? Dont know the girl and not sticking up for her really, but he`s only done one report and says (QUOTE) "after a few days, went for a check up and an now HIV positive" WTF, Dont HIV only show up after 3 months or so. Am i being stupid or does this not ring true somehow?

there is a PCR DNA test that is used by porn stars which CAN show HIV after only a few days however a week or so is more likely. For example when the HIV scare hit the LA porn stars the guy who started it tested negative a few days after returning from a shoot in Brazil, and only tested positive on his next test. So it is POSSIBLE he could test positive but it's dubious........and in any case the test is only an indicator, you'd be told very clearly by the clinic to come back in a month for a more accurate test (3 months is the most accurate test but when I went they said the one month DUO test was almost as accurate)

However the real reason I'm suspicious about this FR is that as others have said is the way he goes about writing it. It just doesn't ring true and seems like someone trying to f*ck up her business good and proper. The whole bit about being a married man with kids and I'm probably going to kill myself just comes across as him trying to get a reaction from the readers. Can't understand how a report like that could appear, who's checking them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My instincts are the whole event is a figment of the writer's imagination, it just doesn't sound right. The report is also seriously libellous and both the writer and the those who published it would be liable for defamation. Even if he is HIV+, why assume the woman is responsible as opposed to some previous partner? He'd also have to have been extremely unlucky to get HIV from just one incident of intercourse when the condom broke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone read this negative report 96008 yet? Dont know the girl and not sticking up for her really, but he`s only done one report and says (QUOTE) "after a few days, went for a check up and an now HIV positive" WTF, Dont HIV only show up after 3 months or so. Am i being stupid or does this not ring true somehow?

Report now deleted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My instincts are the whole event is a figment of the writer's imagination, it just doesn't sound right. The report is also seriously libellous and both the writer and the those who published it would be liable for defamation. Even if he is HIV+, why assume the woman is responsible as opposed to some previous partner? He'd also have to have been extremely unlucky to get HIV from just one incident of intercourse when the condom broke.

agreed on how unlucky he'd have to be. In the case of those who caught HIV in the famous porno incident a few years ago they only caught it so easily because they had anal sex (double anal in fact i.e two cocks in one arse). Vaginal sex is not a very efficient method of passing it on - especially female to male as there's no obvious route for the virus into the man's body unless he's got sores or cuts on his knob, and a woman's vaginal secretions don't contain very large HIV loads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Report now deleted.

Thankgod,its a shame this odious man has not been removed from the website altogether.An accusation like this wouldnt just wreck her working life,it could ruin her real life too as all it takes is one dodgy person who knows who she is,or lives in the same town,to start rumours.It may already be happening for all we know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that it matters now, but how difficult is it for people to learn how to post a link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sad story, BUT... I do not think he caught it from her.

Sad story, I do not think it contains a shred of truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sad story, I do not think it contains a shred of truth.

I agree.the fact that when he returned to the house he was refused entry,i assume before they knew why he was there,shows that he possibly caused trouble before already.For sure,if he now puts up any more reports on this site then the lady should be informed,as he may have passed hiv onto her.very dodgy.x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rapid, nucleic acid (PCR) based tests are positve about 12 days after infection, but the more accurate antibody detection tests take about 3 months to turn positive. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_test#Rapid_or_point-of-care_tests

If he had a positve result at 3 days he was infected before he saw the girl in question; alternatively the FR, now deleted, was simply a libel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rapid, nucleic acid (PCR) based tests are positve about 12 days after infection, but the more accurate antibody detection tests take about 3 months to turn positive. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_test#Rapid_or_point-of-care_tests

If he had a positve result at 3 days he was infected before he saw the girl in question; alternatively the FR, now deleted, was simply a libel.

he probably get kicked out for being drunk or being an idiot and thought it would be a good way to get his own back. I'm still surprised that a first time FR apparently apparently wasn't read by the mods before publishing it, especially since it was marked as a negative FR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm still surprised that a first time FR apparently apparently wasn't read by the mods before publishing it, especially since it was marked as a negative FR.

Well: as far as I know mods don't have an acess to submitted Fr prior publishing. Mods are only moderating this forum. (again, AFAIK)

I do agree, that at least negative reports submitted should be read by Galahad, prior publishing them. Its not that many of them after all (dozen or so per week, if that).

Sorry, G: I am not having a go, (ok, I do), but I am sure you don't want end up with a libel case in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there is a PCR DNA test that is used by porn stars which CAN show HIV after only a few days however a week or so is more likely. For example when the HIV scare hit the LA porn stars the guy who started it tested negative a few days after returning from a shoot in Brazil, and only tested positive on his next test. So it is POSSIBLE he could test positive but it's dubious........and in any case the test is only an indicator, you'd be told very clearly by the clinic to come back in a month for a more accurate test (3 months is the most accurate test but when I went they said the one month DUO test was almost as accurate)

The usual window period for the HIV antibody test (the most common HIV test) is a minimum of 3 months. The RT PCR test is very expensive and the window period is 2 weeks and not few days. There is no form of HIV test that has a window period of just few days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rapid, nucleic acid (PCR) based tests are positve about 12 days after infection, but the more accurate antibody detection tests take about 3 months to turn positive. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_test#Rapid_or_point-of-care_tests

If he had a positve result at 3 days he was infected before he saw the girl in question; alternatively the FR, now deleted, was simply a libel.

I think he should be required to show proof of his test results to Galahad,or be booted of the board.If he continues to post reports then he is maliciously passing on the infection,that is a jailable .If he is hiv positive then the poor girl he reported on should be informed somehow so she can get tested a.s.a.p.x

Edited by Chloe X
added an entire full stop.lol.x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well: as far as I know mods don't have an acess to submitted Fr prior publishing. Mods are only moderating this forum. (again, AFAIK)

I do agree, that at least negative reports submitted should be read by Galahad, prior publishing them. Its not that many of them after all (dozen or so per week, if that).

Sorry, G: I am not having a go, (ok, I do), but I am sure you don't want end up with a libel case in the future.

FRs are solely Galahads domain as various Mods have posted on here before, unless things have changed recently.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think he should be required to show proof of his test results to Galahad,or be booted of the board.If he continues to post reports then he is maliciously passing on the infection,that is a jailable .If he is hiv positive then the poor girl he reported on should be informed somehow so she can get tested a.s.a.p.x

I completely agree and i have read a number of FRs like this and posts on here, one of a lady i punted with that the author posted about on here, from her description he gave i dont even believe he had punted with her and the thread was deleted and the poster banned.

IMO that was a business rival or just simply someone with a personal grudge.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.

IMO that was a business rival or just simply someone with a personal grudge.:)

Lets hope this is the case here.xxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now