Guest Lessingham

Instant "no" on a web picture

25 posts in this topic

I've found one of those web sites that lists the working girls of London- or some of them- by all sorts of genre. It is fun browsing. But I noticed that I was instantly put off some women because they were wearing stetsons! For me it is an instant turn off and a "no".

They may be the greatest of them all, but I will never know.

Anyone else have stupid turn offs when browsing web sites (apart from the obvious like fake pics, £300 a hour and no kissing etc)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but Xenia, anyone who'd be put off by THAT picture of you in a stetson should give up punting for life! ;);)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, that was absolutely not fair Xenia!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree completely - stetsons just look stupid on a girl (or man), hence a turn-off. Now a trilby, that's different...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've found one of those web sites that lists the working girls of London- or some of them- by all sorts of genre. It is fun browsing. But I noticed that I was instantly put off some women because they were wearing stetsons! For me it is an instant turn off and a "no".

They may be the greatest of them all, but I will never know.

Anyone else have stupid turn offs when browsing web sites (apart from the obvious like fake pics, £300 a hour and no kissing etc)

I myself find full nudity a bit too much when peruseing ladies sites, I much prefer to keep something back for my imagination.

I don't mind a hint of bum or cleavage, but some of the full frontal kinda stuff you see on the 'other site'.......;)

Nah just doesn't do it for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've found one of those web sites that lists the working girls of London- or some of them- by all sorts of genre. It is fun browsing. But I noticed that I was instantly put off some women because they were wearing stetsons! For me it is an instant turn off and a "no".

They may be the greatest of them all, but I will never know.

Anyone else have stupid turn offs when browsing web sites (apart from the obvious like fake pics, £300 a hour and no kissing etc)

Stetsons - PMSL. More like a 10 gallon hat on a 2 pint head :D:D Stetsons are for country & western bumkins and rednecks.

I hate profiles where the ladies show covered parts of their anatomy that gives you no clue as to their overall build. Waste of space. Teasing, yes. Useful, no. Similarly, those where the pear-shape of the body tries to be disguised with a shot from the head, kneeling on the bed.

I wont even consider aboue £160hr and if she doesn't kiss, I move on. I cant fathom how you and a woman can be naked for an hour, really intimate yet dont/cant kiss.

Another turn-off is a shitty load of waffle about 'her services' which, once read, tells you sweet FA. Need I go on?

You can't beat an honest decent WG, with a straight no-nonsense profile. All this fancy marketing shit cuts no ice with me. I work with people in marketing who are supposed to have a university education.

To call them clueless wankers is being kind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops, I have a beret, a tophat, a fascinator and a trilby on some pics, is that ok?

I love hats, I make hats!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I myself find full nudity a bit too much when peruseing ladies sites, I much prefer to keep something back for my imagination.

Quite the opposite here, I want to know what I'm getting. I don't want to be surprised by plastic tits.

Or hairy muff.

Or a cock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fine with other hats, Dollymop. Set at a jaunty angle and worn with panache they are a real tease. But stetsons! And Saturday night hen parties in their pink stetsons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oops, I have a beret, a tophat, a fascinator and a trilby on some pics, is that ok?

I love hats, I make hats!

Not sure what the fascinator is Dolly, but I can envisage all the others on you, and they all look wonderful!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love wearing hats for photo shoots. Ones I can think of black trilby, straw cowboy hat, little pillbox hat with veil. Hats are very sexy.

For me an instant "no" in the pic is stockinged feet with no shoes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quite the opposite here, I want to know what I'm getting. I don't want to be surprised by plastic tits.

Or hairy muff.

Or a cock.

Absolutely, clothed pix are fine if you are buying clothes. And what does put me off are those are those blurred face pix. If you have to, put some close ups of your mouth and eyes somewhere or wear a beautiful mask so you can still see the eyes and mouth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone else have stupid turn offs when browsing web sites (apart from the obvious like fake pics, £300 a hour and no kissing etc)

The "sultry" look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pictures where the girl looks miserable or sullen. A smile makes a lot of difference to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You look fab darling.

Just dont wear a pink one with silver band from the Home bargains shop :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I go back a long way, Amber. I remember the Scandinavian porn comics of the 70s. Every single guy, no matter what perversion he was up to, wore his socks! It was as much part of the outfit as the handle bar tash and mullet perm.

Oddly enough though, white ankle socks on a wg are bloody awesome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now