Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Axemplay

Hypothetical Question about OWO

32 posts in this topic

Just suppose for a second that scientists found a way to utterly eradicate all STIs (I know that's impossible but bear with me) how would all the ladies that don't provide OWO react? would you feel differently about providing it if it was 100% safe or would you stick to your guns?, I'm really curious to know your opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just suppose for a second that scientists found a way to utterly eradicate all STIs (I know that's impossible but bear with me) how would all the ladies that don't provide OWO react? would you feel differently about providing it if it was 100% safe or would you stick to your guns?, I'm really curious to know your opinions.

If we're assuming that the only reason some of us don't offer OWO is the STI risk, and STIs have been eradicated, shouldn't we be including everyone who doesn't offer bareback full-stop? :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a fair point, so I'll expand the question, if STIs were eradicated totally, would you feel under any extra pressure to give OWO and bareback sex?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not no and i do not believe STDS will ever be eradicated, new ones will probably mutate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's a fair point, so I'll expand the question, if STIs were eradicated totally, would you feel under any extra pressure to give OWO and bareback sex?

is getting pregnant being eradicated from earth as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your opinion Olivia, I know in real life new infections would evolve, but it's not a baiting question, I was honestly curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just suppose for a second that scientists found a way to utterly eradicate all STIs (I know that's impossible but bear with me) how would all the ladies that don't provide OWO react? would you feel differently about providing it if it was 100% safe or would you stick to your guns?, I'm really curious to know your opinions.

If that was the case, I am sure it will be a bit more of oral without available. But its not going to be much more!

As I said on other thread, my impression that majority of the girls don't provide unprotected oral, not because of the risk of STD, but because they don't like to deal with a bare cock, which might be "rancid" (Sorry, Olivia's words), or even if its immaculately clean, they don't like the taste of secretions which comes from the hole of the penis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats an excellent point but I suspect many ladies would just use contraception and take the extra cash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Xenia, one point to bear in mind though is I think the OW only ladies in this scenario would be pressurized far more to do it, thats not right of course, but it would happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If STI's were eradicated (which they won't be), of course BB and OWO would become the overwhelming norm - why not? Oral contraception would stop the risk of pregnancy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If STI's were eradicated (which they won't be), of course BB and OWO would become the overwhelming norm - why not? Oral contraception would stop the risk of pregnancy.

Assuming you trust the WG.

No offence ladies, but I wouldn't hand over the power contraception entirely to the WG like that. I like to be in control of where my baby batter ends up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If STI's were eradicated (which they won't be), of course BB and OWO would become the overwhelming norm - why not? Oral contraception would stop the risk of pregnancy.

oral contraception is not 100% reliable. if an escort is not going to risk it due to an STD, i doubt she will risk it, even it is a small chance, due to getting pregnant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If certain ladies are willing to take the huge risk of doing bareback now, if there were no STIs the number willing to do bareback would skyrocket, and if the worst came to the worst and the pill failed abortion is a possibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assuming you trust the WG.

No offence ladies, but I wouldn't hand over the power contraception entirely to the WG like that. I like to be in control of where my baby batter ends up.

Further to the point if she was that desperate to have your baby, she could "harvest" the sperm from your used condom when your back was turned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was reading a web site the other day about the joys of sex in Thailand. There was an "essay" by a chap who went over in 2002 and was only interested in bareback sex and uncovered oral. As I read I wondered what year his dick rotted off in and if he was still with us.

What is this obsession with uncovered sex with working girls? Even if you hypothosised there was a pill that turned your semen into chocolate, uncovered oral ain't going to happen. If you punt, you wear condoms, that way we all stay as healthy as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of girls who say publically they don't do OWO, actually do when you meet them, I am also shocked at the amount of girls that offer bareback (Without it being requested) despite advertising otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you should ask if STDs were eradicated would any punters prefer covered OW and covered intercourse? Answer? about 0.0001% therefore 99% of punters would simply avoid any WG who insisted in covered sex of any kind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from risks of STD/HIV some girls still refuse to have CUM in their mouth because they will not like it anyways. Those who don't mind it are anyway doing it now. Maybe 5% who are refusing for health reason will start to give OWO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id have to think seriously about carrying on working. I dont mind OWO at all, in fact I much prefer it. Bareback sex is another matter though. Its just something thats TOO intimate for comfort (and makes a mess!)

Also venturing into the territory where the OP almost casually mentioned abortion...prevention is better than cure I think. Thats just my view though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just suppose for a second that scientists found a way to utterly eradicate all STIs (I know that's impossible but bear with me) how would all the ladies that don't provide OWO react? would you feel differently about providing it if it was 100% safe or would you stick to your guns?, I'm really curious to know your opinions.

Cervical Cancer isn't an STI - have you thought about that one? Or are you going to exclude any human illness in your hypothetical question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A lot of girls who say publically they don't do OWO, actually do when you meet them, I am also shocked at the amount of girls that offer bareback (Without it being requested) despite advertising otherwise.

I wouldnt know about the OW ladies actually offering OWO as i only book those 121 that offer OWO, but i have a number of times been offered BB out of the blue by a WG. They usually say its because i like you, its always a passion killer and i get out of there as soon as possible. I am not naive enough to believe i would be the only punter she spun that line to, and even if i was i wouldnt be in the slightest interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago, while I was in the transition from escort to masseuse, I used to offer a massage and HR with oral. While escorting my norm was to offer OWO and I thought I wouldn't like sucking a condom. For a lesser rate I also offered massage and HR only, the massage with oral was 80/20 the most popular.

I started to get the odd guy asking me to use a condom on him for the oral, strange I thought, but then I started to realise that I was putting some guys off by only offering OWO, so I offered both. More took me up on the condom, and then I started getting choosy which dicks I wanted to suck. Foreskin don't roll back or too much pre-cum, you're wearing a condom. I openly stated this on my website.

Then I offended a guy, he was a really wet HJ and I didn't want it in my mouth so told him I would be using a condom. I knew he didn't want it, I offered to give him the oral part of the massage money back, but no he went for the oral with a condom.

I don't like offending people and knew I might well do so again... so I stopped offering oral. In my case, as a masseuse, I came to realise that I was indeed putting off a lot of clients by being that bit too intimate with them.

I think you'll find lots of fellas, all STIs eradicated or not, will still want an escort to use a condom, and there will still be a lot of escorts who will want to use them too.

When I used to have sex with a client, a condom was a much my barrier as an STI barrier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Id have to think seriously about carrying on working. I dont mind OWO at all, in fact I much prefer it. Bareback sex is another matter though. Its just something thats TOO intimate for comfort (and makes a mess!)

Also venturing into the territory where the OP almost casually mentioned abortion...prevention is better than cure I think. Thats just my view though.

Believe me, through personal experience my opinions of abortion aren't flippant or casual, I was simply stating it's what some ladies would do if the worst happened, stating something doesn't mean I endorse it or think it should occur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cervical Cancer isn't an STI - have you thought about that one? Or are you going to exclude any human illness in your hypothetical question?

Yes Justagirl, the reason I asked the question is because I wanted to know what the ladies would do if there were suddenly no risk of illness from sexual contact. I'm truly sorry if I've got anyones back up, I swear I'm not trying to propogandize for unsafe sex, I don't even have OWO myself, I was just genuinely curious to see what would happen. I'm fully aware this scenario is 100% impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes Justagirl, the reason I asked the question is because I wanted to know what the ladies would do if there were suddenly no risk of illness from sexual contact. I'm truly sorry if I've got anyones back up, I swear I'm not trying to propogandize for unsafe sex, I don't even have OWO myself, I was just genuinely curious to see what would happen. I'm fully aware this scenario is 100% impossible.

You didn't get my back up at all - far from it :) but both men and women conveniently forget about cervical cancer - the risks are high! and it's not an STI/STD.

I did not answer your question though so perhaps I should.

Hypothetically speaking - as I'm single I don't have any intimacy issues or saving myself for someone special. Many girls - and rightly so - will only offer limited intimacy (no kissing, no OWO etc), saving the best of their partners.

But the messy side of BB sex (sticky, oozy stuff and having to wash the sheets) doesn't appeal to me - so no: can think I'd offer than in an airy fairy world.

As for anything else, I already kiss like there's no tomorrow and love OWO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0