Guest Tonyofstoney

'Legit' Sensual Massage and 'Escorting'

6 posts in this topic

A comment of my own on here has set me thinking. (It does happen occasionally! :rolleyes: )

To paraphrase (as I can't be arsed to track down my exact sentence) I said that I don't do FRs on ladies who regard themselves as 'legitimate' massage therapists because I wouldn't want to blow my chances of seeing them again because someone said they'd seen my report on an escort website. The thing is though, the ladies I'm talking about,while quite sincere about what they do, provide full nudity, body-to-body massage, extended HR and allow extensive touching (pretty much everything except the yoni - you get used to using different terms with these girls). In effect they provide far more extensive services than, for example, Lilly B or Lady of the Mansion - not that I am for a moment demeaning the excellent service they provide, yet whereas Lilly and LOTM are quite happy to associate themselves with the wider escorting community, the 'legit' ladies would, I'm sure, be horrified to be considered 'prostitutes' (and I must admit I don't think of them in those terms).

Maybe it's just something to dio with the way they came to where they are now. I know a lot of the Abortwank/PNet style sensual masseuses did at one time offer full service, or worked as maids/receptionists in parlours, whereas with the 'legits' they seem to have either started out in straight massage and decided it was daft not to provide maximum relaxation, or to have come to tantra as a result of interest in Eastern mysticism. Or, playing devil's advocate, maybe the so-called legits are just kidding themselves.

I always treat any lady I meet with equal courtesy and respect but, as I've implied here, my mind does tend to classify these service providers into two different groups - it has a mind of its own sometimes. :rolleyes:

I'm not sure I've reached any clear conclusions at the end of all this, but I have found it quite cathartic rambling through this little thought for the day!

Namaste. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skipped most of the ramble, but picked up on the 'LOTM being happy to associate with escorting' - I think you'll find she has categorically denied 'being a prostitute' on more than one occasion.

IMO, you provide sexual services, you are a prostitute. If I have a booking with a guy who doesn't want a full service, I don't think afterwards 'Ah well, I wasn't a WG today'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skipped most of the ramble, but picked up on the 'LOTM being happy to associate with escorting' - I think you'll find she has categorically denied 'being a prostitute' on more than one occasion.

IMO, you provide sexual services, you are a prostitute. If I have a booking with a guy who doesn't want a full service, I don't think afterwards 'Ah well, I wasn't a WG today'.

I'm aware of your views about Lottie's views Claire, but she does participate in this board, put her profile on here and on That Site etc. The sort of 'legits' I'm thinking about wouldn't even dream of doing so, and liberally scatter terms like 'lingam', 'yoni', 'chakras' etc through their adverts and websites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the day so to say providing a lady is happy with the way she works, is not forced or coerced in any way how she chooses to promote or market herself and how she sees her self is her choice

The word Prostitute whilst is may be linguistically a correct name.title or description for the services offered in return for payment it is often taken as a negative term with many associating the word with certain area's of the business that being street work or those forced into the business and as Tony states it would be inappropriate to promote such on boards that they choose not to associate with for what ever reason if it causes them to feel uncomfortable,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
at the end of the day so to say providing a lady is happy with the way she works, is not forced or coerced in any way how she chooses to promote or market herself and how she sees her self is her choice

The word Prostitute whilst is may be linguistically a correct name.title or description for the services offered in return for payment it is often taken as a negative term with many associating the word with certain area's of the business that being street work or those forced into the business and as Tony states it would be inappropriate to promote such on boards that they choose not to associate with for what ever reason if it causes them to feel uncomfortable,

Thanks Beth. Just to be clear, I'm not for a moment denigrating those ladies who promote thsemselves at this end of the market. I love them - I can't wait to meet the lovely Louisa, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was that nice Mr Lennon who said "whatever gets you through the night is alright"

If a woman wants to wrap her services in Eastern Mysticism and not be a prostitute, good for her. And if a guy wants to go and be massaged by them and pretend he is not punting, then that is fine too.

But you're still both a pair of dirty stopouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now