Matium

Timewasters

48 posts in this topic

I can understand the rage that girls have against timewasters. After all, it must be exasperating to have to deal with men who want to book you for an overnight but have to cancel at the last moment because their Aunt Molly is coming around for tea and they can't go out, or those men who send long e-mails detailing how they'll whisk the girl off to their yachts in the Bahamas or those who ask the girls to describe on the phone "What you'll do to me, luv ?"

Those men are timewasters and should more accurately be called fantasists or wankers. But what about the genuine men ?

What I mean is that a real man looking for a woman might phone 5-6 girls to make enquiries so that he can get the girl most suitable for him. After all, he'll only have money for one girl so all the other girls, he's asked, should not automatically lump him as a "timewaster" simply because he hasn't selected them.

A man who makes multiple enquiries but only has enough money for one girl, should never be labelled a timewaster in my view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Goes without saying really. There are so many fake escorts around - specially on ** these days - that the first task when feeling in the punting mode is to find out who is really offering sex for cash. Next, its only natural to shop around for that special one at the price you can afford - weeding out the ones with a long list of 'extras' etc. Its not only punters who waste peoples time, as I have learned in recent months!

That is true.

A lot of call girls are timewasters who mess punters about.

A man has a right to make an informed choice so as not to waste his hard earned money. Girls must accept the fact that they will be one of five or six that a man may phone and that they cannot automatically expect to be the one who is chosen - and it certainly does not make the man a timewaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes met my share who use fake pics and when u realised u've wasted your time demand 'cancellation fees'. This happenf to a mate, when he went to leave when inside her flat, she threatened to get the men in the other room. He panicked, paid and felt like he was being robbed. Wldnt the best thing to do is take yr fone out and threaten to call the police for robbery, by a 'model' who turns out to b a prostitute and has website etc? Thats what i told him. They wld then start to panic. He said he was too scarf and ashamed to call cops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was one occasion when I was sharing a flat with 3 other working ladies. There was a guy made 4 seperate bookings on the other site to see all four of us at the same time. We all accepted and he emailed all 4 of us to confirm. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There was one occasion when I was sharing a flat with 3 other working ladies. There was a guy made 4 seperate bookings on the other site to see all four of us at the same time. We all accepted and he emailed all 4 of us to confirm. :rolleyes:

This has happened to me too when a shared a working flat with 2 girls.. guy rang and booked us all separately but for the same time, I got suspicious when he kept ringing for directions, to 2 of us.. he did turn up, one of the other girls rang his mob when he was in the apartment, his face was a picture.. we told him to piss off. If that isn't a time waster I don't know what is. I used to know a lot of girls working in MK and Npton, punters don't realise a many girls are friends and will discuss wankers and serial timewasters, they end up getting barred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This has happened to me too when a shared a working flat with 2 girls.. guy rang and booked us all separately but for the same time, I got suspicious when he kept ringing for directions, to 2 of us.. he did turn up, one of the other girls rang his mob when he was in the apartment, his face was a picture.. we told him to piss off. If that isn't a time waster I don't know what is. I used to know a lot of girls working in MK and Npton, punters don't realise a many girls are friends and will discuss wankers and serial timewasters, they end up getting barred.

At least your's turned up lol. We would maybe have let him in and let him choose lol. Then if he had dared walk out on us all it would have been troosers oot the windae.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A man who makes multiple enquiries but only has enough money for one girl, should never be labelled a timewaster in my view.

Then yoru view is wrong, you look at a number of cars when you only want to buy one, its called exploring the options. Remember a high percentage of "girls" are Fake / timewasters / unreliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There was one occasion when I was sharing a flat with 3 other working ladies. There was a guy made 4 seperate bookings on the other site to see all four of us at the same time. We all accepted and he emailed all 4 of us to confirm. :rolleyes:

I've often caught timewasters out that way when touring with Amanda or other ladies too. I usually string them along for a bit before letting them know exactly what I think of them. :eek:

Now, the "troosers oot the windae" one is a novel way or sorting the issue out. I'm just imagining the guy having to walk through reception in his y-fronts.

Lmao. :eek::D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I've had the same thing when I've been touring with someone else. Phoning a few escorts to make enquiries isn't a problem. Making a booking with more than one of us at the same time is serious timewasting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A man who makes multiple enquiries but only has enough money for one girl, should never be labelled a timewaster in my view.

A man has a right to make an informed choice so as not to waste his hard earned money.

Of course you are entitled to make as many enquiries as you feel necessary, that applies to any product or service. :rolleyes:;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can understand the rage that girls have against timewasters. After all, it must be exasperating to have to deal with men who want to book you for an overnight but have to cancel at the last moment because their Aunt Molly is coming around for tea and they can't go out, or those men who send long e-mails detailing how they'll whisk the girl off to their yachts in the Bahamas or those who ask the girls to describe on the phone "What you'll do to me, luv ?"

Those men are timewasters and should more accurately be called fantasists or wankers. But what about the genuine men ?

What I mean is that a real man looking for a woman might phone 5-6 girls to make enquiries so that he can get the girl most suitable for him. After all, he'll only have money for one girl so all the other girls, he's asked, should not automatically lump him as a "timewaster" simply because he hasn't selected them.

A man who makes multiple enquiries but only has enough money for one girl, should never be labelled a timewaster in my view.

Punters who really are timewasters are wankers and do genuine punters with enquiries no favours IMO. This is a problem with no solution, these wankers will always be about in my view so its about how best to deal with them. To be honest its a by-product of working as a WG as are WGs that lie to punters about services they offer etc.

Some WGs on here take the view that by directing a punter to her site/profile that is sufficient so he can read what services she offers and what she looks like etc assuming he hasnt already looked at her site/profile. The problem with this view is in my experience many sites/profiles are either displaying services that are not actually on offer because the lady has forgotten to update them or are lying to attract punters in. I require confirmation of services on offer on the phone, if i get to hers and she says such and such is not on offer i nowadays walk, she is relying on me thinking with my dick which i used to, but nowadays i ensure i have alternatives and luckily live in an area with plenty of them.

So the best i can do is get that phone confirmation and in good faith take her word, by only relying on what her site/profile says i am not doing the best i can do in my view. Of course if the lady isnt prepared to discuss services on the phone which is a rare occurence in my 26 years punting, thats up to her, but she wont get my business. In the punting world outside this forum most WGs know from previous punters that some at least want to know what services she offers, i find very little reluctance to discuss this on the phone.

I will always use the phone and have no interest in other means of contacting a newbie to me, a lot can be discovered by a quick chat, so although not infallible its my method of punting, sending emails holds no interest to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Punters who really are timewasters are wankers and do genuine punters with enquiries no favours IMO. This is a problem with no solution, these wankers will always be about in my view so its about how best to deal with them. To be honest its a by-product of working as a WG as are WGs that lie to punters about services they offer etc.

Some WGs on here take the view that by directing a punter to her site/profile that is sufficient so he can read what services she offers and what she looks like etc assuming he hasnt already looked at her site/profile. The problem with this view is in my experience many sites/profiles are either displaying services that are not actually on offer because the lady has forgotten to update them or are lying to attract punters in. I require confirmation of services on offer on the phone, if i get to hers and she says such and such is not on offer i nowadays walk, she is relying on me thinking with my dick which i used to, but nowadays i ensure i have alternatives and luckily live in an area with plenty of them.

So the best i can do is get that phone confirmation and in good faith take her word, by only relying on what her site/profile says i am not doing the best i can do in my view. Of course if the lady isnt prepared to discuss services on the phone which is a rare occurence in my 26 years punting, thats up to her, but she wont get my business. In the punting world outside this forum most WGs know from previous punters that some at least want to know what services she offers, i find very little reluctance to discuss this on the phone.

I will always use the phone and have no interest in other means of contacting a newbie to me, a lot can be discovered by a quick chat, so although not infallible its my method of punting, sending emails holds no interest to me.

I don't mind guys ringing and making sure I'm actually the person I purport to be. What I won't do is go into explicit detail and unfortunately a few do go down this line with the excuse "Well I need to know before I can decide who to see". If a guy hasn't seen my site I will refer them to it as I think seeing photos plus links to FRs is something he will benefit from - especially if he isn't sure.

Only time someone may come over as a TW is if they constantly ask the same questions over and over, trying to get you to be explicit.

I've one question for the guys;

Is asking what you are wearing right now legit or a guy messing about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't mind guys ringing and making sure I'm actually the person I purport to be. What I won't do is go into explicit detail and unfortunately a few do go down this line with the excuse "Well I need to know before I can decide who to see". If a guy hasn't seen my site I will refer them to it as I think seeing photos plus links to FRs is something he will benefit from - especially if he isn't sure.

Only time someone may come over as a TW is if they constantly ask the same questions over and over, trying to get you to be explicit.

I've one question for the guys;

Is asking what you are wearing right now legit or a guy messing about?

Asking you that is messing about, its in no way relevant IMO. I understand about not going into explicit detail, that is a different thing entirely. I also on occassion punt with ladies with no FRs or any form of feedback, to me the site/profile is a very useful guide but not sufficient on its own to get my business. I already know what i only going to ask when i ring, its often the same straightforward questions that i have been asking WGs for years, i want to get the answers i require and if i like those answers, book her, not wank while speaking to her on the phone, that is of zero interest to me. Phone sex is not my bag, i tried an 0898 in the 80s, what a load of old codswallop, but as i said previously these real TWs are wankers and do us genuine punters no favours, i curse them all.:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Punters who really are timewasters are wankers and do genuine punters with enquiries no favours IMO. This is a problem with no solution, these wankers will always be about in my view so its about how best to deal with them. To be honest its a by-product of working as a WG as are WGs that lie to punters about services they offer etc.

Some WGs on here take the view that by directing a punter to her site/profile that is sufficient so he can read what services she offers and what she looks like etc assuming he hasnt already looked at her site/profile. The problem with this view is in my experience many sites/profiles are either displaying services that are not actually on offer because the lady has forgotten to update them or are lying to attract punters in. I require confirmation of services on offer on the phone, if i get to hers and she says such and such is not on offer i nowadays walk, she is relying on me thinking with my dick which i used to, but nowadays i ensure i have alternatives and luckily live in an area with plenty of them.

So the best i can do is get that phone confirmation and in good faith take her word, by only relying on what her site/profile says i am not doing the best i can do in my view. Of course if the lady isnt prepared to discuss services on the phone which is a rare occurence in my 26 years punting, thats up to her, but she wont get my business. In the punting world outside this forum most WGs know from previous punters that some at least want to know what services she offers, i find very little reluctance to discuss this on the phone.

I will always use the phone and have no interest in other means of contacting a newbie to me, a lot can be discovered by a quick chat, so although not infallible its my method of punting, sending emails holds no interest to me.

When you say you have alternatives lined up, do you mean you double book? If so, that makes you a timewaster by WG definition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Asking you that is messing about, its in no way relevant IMO. I understand about not going into explicit detail, that is a different thing entirely. I also on occassion punt with ladies with no FRs or any form of feedback, to me the site/profile is a very useful guide but not sufficient on its own to get my business. I already know what i only going to ask when i ring, its often the same straightforward questions that i have been asking WGs for years, i want to get the answers i require and if i like those answers, book her, not wank while speaking to her on the phone, that is of zero interest to me. Phone sex is not my bag, i tried an 0898 in the 80s, what a load of old codswallop, but as i said previously these real TWs are wankers and do us genuine punters no favours, i curse them all.:rolleyes:

I assume in your case this simply means enthusiastic confirmation that DFK, OWO and sex with a condom are on the menu?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you say you have alternatives lined up, do you mean you double book? If so, that makes you a timewaster by WG definition.

I dont need to double book. I always have the numbers of regulars i have punted with before and its very rare they cant fit me in, i might have to wait a while though, but if they are all booked i can always book into a party. I do appreciate some punters dont have so much choice though.:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I assume in your case this simply means enthusiastic confirmation that DFK, OWO and sex with a condom are on the menu?

Indeed along with confirmation of dress size and a few other things, but its a well used script unless i am looking for something a bit more specialized. I often punt on the day i ring so i require the information immediately and take it from there.:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course you are entitled to make as many enquiries as you feel necessary, that applies to any product or service. :rolleyes:;)

Jim! It sounds like you are comparing ladies to cars or furniture!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't mind guys ringing and making sure I'm actually the person I purport to be. What I won't do is go into explicit detail and unfortunately a few do go down this line with the excuse "Well I need to know before I can decide who to see". If a guy hasn't seen my site I will refer them to it as I think seeing p

I can't recall a single time when this has been said to me but what I don't like and prompts me to instantly log a caller as "tw don't answer" is...

when I answer my phone "hello" in a cheery voice :eek: and the first thing they

say is "you available today?" with a wankery type of tone :rolleyes:

I then ask who they are calling and they put the phone down.

Is asking what you are wearing right now legit or a guy messing about?

Again I have never been asked this but I would immediately put the phone down on anyone who did. There will be inexperienced girls who do this, tell the caller "oh I am wearing a tight short skirt and no nickers" etc :eek: and then they wonder why they get so many no show idiots.

As for the guys who ring several ladies and then make their choice, of course that is quite reasonable.... we are here to be chosen!

However, guys who actually book several ladies and then choose, without cancelling the unchosen.... are time wasters for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't recall a single time when this has been said to me but what I don't like and prompts me to instantly log a caller as "tw don't answer" is...

when I answer my phone "hello" in a cheery voice :eek: and the first thing they

say is "you available today?" with a wankery type of tone :rolleyes:

I then ask who they are calling and they put the phone down.

Again I have never been asked this but I would immediately put the phone down on anyone who did. There will be inexperienced girls who do this, tell the caller "oh I am wearing a tight short skirt and no nickers" etc :eek: and then they wonder why they get so many no show idiots.

As for the guys who ring several ladies and then make their choice, of course that is quite reasonable.... we are here to be chosen!

However, guys who actually book several ladies and then choose, without cancelling the unchosen.... are time wasters for sure.

Yes funnily enough those who ask for explicit descriptions do not go on to make an appointment. Same for the majority who want to know what you are wearing. Even better they may then accuse you of being unfriendly. Well that's the decision made then!

Never had the 'wankery' are you available today, although one or two guys do seem to forget who they are supposed to be ringing and that can be a bad sign too. Especially when they call back again within 24 hours and seem to have forgotten everything you said. Not sure they'd remember to come to an appointment at that rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those men are timewasters and should more accurately be called fantasists or wankers. But what about the genuine men ?

What I mean is that a real man looking for a woman might phone 5-6 girls to make enquiries so that he can get the girl most suitable for him. After all, he'll only have money for one girl so all the other girls, he's asked, should not automatically lump him as a "timewaster" simply because he hasn't selected them.

A man who makes multiple enquiries but only has enough money for one girl, should never be labelled a timewaster in my view.

I agree with you ... to an extent.

A real man doesn't phone the same lady every couple of weeks, asking exactly the same questions he asked on the previous occasions, and not realising after about the third call, that she's getting a sense of deja vous about his enquiry and a certainty that he's never going to book. I don't expect every guy that phones or emails me to go on to make a booking. But there's enough info on my web site and if he's done his home-work, his call is often to make a booking, not make enquiries already responded to on my site.

Some guys justify the call to ask for details already provided on the site they've just told you they've come from by saying they want to hear the lady speak and see if they click. Well, the irritation this approach triggers as she wonders if the guy has a brain will probably put him off anyway.

Occasionally, a guy might be targetting a particular escort demographic - ebony, bbw, etc. Birds of a feather f(l)uck together, and all that. I talk a lot with other black escorts, bbw escorts, etc. Word soon gets around about the guys that we know will never book, but just get off on talking about it, even if the talk isn't necessarily smutty. The he gets filed away under the DNA or WOS group in our phone address books.

Time wasters come in many shapes and sizes. But shopping around is not the same as time-wasting, as long as you are not booking or giving the impression that a booking is imminent.

xxx

Pru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the best i can do is get that phone confirmation and in good faith take her word, by only relying on what her site/profile says i am not doing the best i can do in my view. Of course if the lady isnt prepared to discuss services on the phone which is a rare occurence in my 26 years punting, thats up to her, but she wont get my business. In the punting world outside this forum most WGs know from previous punters that some at least want to know what services she offers, i find very little reluctance to discuss this on the phone.

I will never get into the routine of rattling off a list of my services on the phone to a caller. 1. there are too many 2. some of what I offer is so diverse and so specialised that I'd end up repulsing a vanilla guy who had no interest in hearing about strap on play or auto erotic asphyxiation, and driving away the submissive who doesn't want to imagine his mistress on her knees giving head to a vanilla client. 3. Too often, you can't tell if the guy is genuinely trying to guarantee a service important to him or if he's just killing time for a free wank.

If a guy asks for my services, I don't refuse to discuss them. I kick the ball back into his court and ask him what exactly he is looking for. This has helped to quickly confirm what I do and do not do (if a guy wants to cum in a ladies face, why has he got to listen to a dozen services which don't include cum in face, only then to ask, will you allow me to cum in your face - he's clearly been getting off on listening to a lady describing sexual acts).

In the days when I didn't offer anal, this was often the one thing the guy wanted to know. And after I'd given a quick summary of what I offered and we'd all but booked, then he'd ask the anal question. And all talks would flounder. I'd hang up the phone really irritated that he hadn't asked that in the first place and saved us both some precious time.

xxx

Pru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've one question for the guys;

Is asking what you are wearing right now legit or a guy messing about?

That for me is my cue to put the phone down and put him on my auto reject list.

xxx

Pru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't recall a single time when this has been said to me but what I don't like and prompts me to instantly log a caller as "tw don't answer" is...

when I answer my phone "hello" in a cheery voice ;) and the first thing they

say is "you available today?" with a wankery type of tone ;)

I then ask who they are calling and they put the phone down.

I don't log them as a TW but a man whose opening line is "Are you working today?" doesn't have the kind of communication skills that take a bonk from just a plain old bonk to a mind blowing experience. I always tell those callers I'm busy which ends the phone call and means neither of us has to suffer the other's company.

xxx

Pru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best ones are "who's that?".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now