Dreamweaverman

Sex workers offering BB sex .. Worrying trend

179 posts in this topic

About 10 years ago, there is no mention of sex without condom, now I have found lots of girls are offering Sex without condom as part of the package or for little as 20 pounds extra. Seems like there are lots of punters using these girls for BB sex. By playing Russian roulette, are we all heading for disaster like what happend in Russian street prostitutes in 90's that 50 percent of them end up with HIV positive and most of their clients gone forever and no record of it!!.. Normally the sex workers take more care than others regarding about sexual health !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, just yesterday a new profile appeared and the girl was pictured presumably around her local town and looked really 'real' if you know what I mean and apparently without stresses of particular kinds in her life (as far as the photos showed).

Then buried in the profile was a willingness to do BB for a small extra, as Dreamweaverman has already referred to.

Some regret that I had to abandon thoughts of seeing her but more regret about the situation she is putting herself in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep its a fact that BB is easily obtained as is A and lots of other fun

Personally I dread being hit by a bus as I cross the road cos Im not as quick on my feet as I was, so worries attached to BB tend to be 'so what I'll enjoy life while Im here'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
About 10 years ago, there is no mention of sex without condom, now I have found lots of girls are offering Sex without condom as part of the package or for little as 20 pounds extra. Seems like there are lots of punters using these girls for BB sex. By playing Russian roulette, are we all heading for disaster like what happend in Russian street prostitutes in 90's that 50 percent of them end up with HIV positive and most of their clients gone forever and no record of it!!.. Normally the sex workers take more care than others regarding about sexual health !

With your self proclaimed insights into EEs on Adultw0rk surely you know why many more of them offer BB than in the past?

I would clarify BB was being advertised 10 years ago but no where near as much as now. As your FRs show you have punted with a number of WGs that did offer BB on their profiles, i know because i checked at the time of your FRs on occassion, do you not think by punting with them at all BB or not assuming they were aware what the abbreviation meant, you are helping keep them in business. Personally i avoid those i know offer BB, why dont you if your so concerned about this trend, which i agree is very worrying?:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eek! 418 girls in London on that site offering BB. The 1st one I looked at proudly stating £100 for an hour - no extra charge with double smileys!

Other observations - 555 girls in London will give hardsports and 167 girls in London will receive hardsports! I have no idea how dangerous this is but it doesn't sound too good.

What the hell is going on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep its a fact that BB is easily obtained as is A and lots of other fun

Personally I dread being hit by a bus as I cross the road cos Im not as quick on my feet as I was, so worries attached to BB tend to be 'so what I'll enjoy life while Im here'

When you get run over by the bus, it's only you that will be killed you little moron - those who offer and those who partake in risky practices, increase the risk factor for ALL of us....just go crawl back into your cave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
About 10 years ago, there is no mention of sex without condom

How much of that is just an increase of the places where people can advertise? I'm willing to bet that bareback is not much more/less prevalent than it was 10 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eek! 418 girls in London on that site offering BB. The 1st one I looked at proudly stating £100 for an hour - no extra charge with double smileys!

Other observations - 555 girls in London will give hardsports and 167 girls in London will receive hardsports! I have no idea how dangerous this is but it doesn't sound too good.

What the hell is going on?

Hardsports is shitting, no idea of how dangerous it is and i have no interest in finding out.

I would say from experience many enjoys lists on A/W are wrong, many WGs tick virtually every box and only ringing/emailing them will you get clarification exactly what they actually do offer, assuming they arent liars of course.

This has been going on for years but certainly BB has been getting advertised more and more as time as gone by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, just yesterday a new profile appeared and the girl was pictured presumably around her local town and looked really 'real' if you know what I mean and apparently without stresses of particular kinds in her life (as far as the photos showed).

Then buried in the profile was a willingness to do BB for a small extra, as Dreamweaverman has already referred to.

Some regret that I had to abandon thoughts of seeing her but more regret about the situation she is putting herself in.

that's probably a fake profile. It's a perfect description of the type of photos that set off alarm bells for me on that site. Real escort pics on there are not of the girls on a night out. It's either a fake profile to make money from a private gallery, someone trying to get their ex back or *possibly* a real profile but with fake pics. If there's no phone number and none appears in a few days then it's not the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
that's probably a fake profile. It's a perfect description of the type of photos that set off alarm bells for me on that site. Real escort pics on there are not of the girls on a night out. It's either a fake profile to make money from a private gallery, someone trying to get their ex back or *possibly* a real profile but with fake pics. If there's no phone number and none appears in a few days then it's not the latter.

Not the point of the thread but does not appear fake for certain reasons but fair enough to assume something's fake if in doubt I suppose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the size of A---W, I am wondering whether it is a trend in advertising, as suggested, or merely a trend in the OP's observations, together with quite hasty conclusions. I have noticed a high correspondence between alleged BB providers and factors that indicate fake profiles. Two other things. 'Bareback' is one if the highest rated keyword searches on A---W (info from usual web analysis sites). Secondly, mention of BB in the profile rather than the 'enjoys' list carries a penalty of having the profile removed as soon as they spot it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not the point of the thread but does not appear fake for certain reasons but fair enough to assume something's fake if in doubt I suppose.

ok - but having done a quick search on london escorts I can say that a good number of them are totally fake profiles. Numbers available are actually a lot less than some people are quoting on here. The whole subject has been done to death...repeatedly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Secondly, mention of BB in the profile rather than the 'enjoys' list carries a penalty of having the profile removed as soon as they spot it.

Have I read your post correctly? are you saying that if a service provider has BB on her "Enjoys list" then that is Ok, but if she has the text, for example, "I enjoy BB", then it is likely that her profile will be removed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a talk on the radio this morning about the oil disaster in the Gulf (stay with me I'll get to the point eventually). The guy talked about probability and then about low frequenct high impact events, the one in a million chances but have huge impacts.

It seems as a species we discount these events, being more concerned with the high frequency stuff, that may even be trivial.

It is the same with bareback. The risks are deemed low so we discount the impact. But the impact in health terms is so huge you really have to be a complete idiot to even roll those odds.

Wear a condom and everyone stays well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.... and 167 girls in London will receive hardsports! I have no idea how dangerous this is but it doesn't sound too good.

Maybe it's just me but how the hell can you, to put it frankly - shit to order ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe it's just me but how the hell can you, to put it frankly - shit to order ?

I assume they have one brewing and hold back till the punter gets their. For the special punter perhaps a curry the night before is the ticket.:):eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have I read your post correctly? are you saying that if a service provider has BB on her "Enjoys list" then that is Ok, but if she has the text, for example, "I enjoy BB", then it is likely that her profile will be removed?

Keep up! There was a thread about the change to the Terms of Use here a couple of weeks ago but I think it's vaporised. :)

The other site's Terms of Use state:

Any reference to un-protected intercourse, or the provision of it, is not permitted in your nickname or profile summary. This includes terms such as bareback and BB. Members offering such services should select the relevant "Enjoys" preferences in their Edit Profile page.

(Hint, go to the other site, follow the Terms of Use link, search for 'bareback'. It's there. No brainer. :eek: )

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have I read your post correctly? are you saying that if a service provider has BB on her "Enjoys list" then that is Ok, but if she has the text, for example, "I enjoy BB", then it is likely that her profile will be removed?

From the terms and conditions:

'Any reference to un-protected intercourse, or the provision of it, is not permitted in your nickname or profile summary. This includes terms such as bareback and BB. Members offering such services should select the relevant "Enjoys" preferences in their Edit Profile page.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep its a fact that BB is easily obtained as is A and lots of other fun

Personally I dread being hit by a bus as I cross the road cos Im not as quick on my feet as I was, so worries attached to BB tend to be 'so what I'll enjoy life while Im here'

Honest opinion, you're either lying about bareback ,or you have caught a dose of something and are saying nothing (I may have missed something along the way but sure someone will correct me if I have and I will apologise). Young adults are queuing up at the STI clinics to be treated these days because they have been irresponsible and this is due to having drunken, unsafe sex on a weekend.

An escort seeing numerous clients, partaking of BB has a massive probability of catching an STI (wonder if it becomes fashionable that those infected will seek out BB escorts to infect ? All kinds of mad fads abound). You only have to look around the rest of the world to see the results of BB sex and this is because they were ill educated, had no choice, or couldn't get condoms - for those in the know it's a feckin' travesty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keep up! There was a thread about the change to the Terms of Use here a couple of weeks ago but I think it's vaporised. :)

The other site's Terms of Use state:

Any reference to un-protected intercourse, or the provision of it, is not permitted in your nickname or profile summary. This includes terms such as bareback and BB. Members offering such services should select the relevant "Enjoys" preferences in their Edit Profile page.

(Hint, go to the other site, follow the Terms of Use link, search for 'bareback'. It's there. No brainer. :eek: )

B

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so in fact what is being said is "We will allow a service provider to advertise that she "enjoys BB", but not allow a service provider to advertise that she "enjoys BB"". I suppose that there is some logic in there somewhere, but I have to admit that currently it eludes me, although I expect that it is a no brainer actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Honest opinion, you're either lying about bareback ,or you have caught a dose of something and are saying nothing (I may have missed something along the way but sure someone will correct me if I have and I will apologise). Young adults are queuing up at the STI clinics to be treated these days because they have been irresponsible and this is due to having drunken, unsafe sex on a weekend.

An escort seeing numerous clients, partaking of BB has a massive probability of catching an STI (wonder if it becomes fashionable that those infected will seek out BB escorts to infect ? All kinds of mad fads abound). You only have to look around the rest of the world to see the results of BB sex and this is because they were ill educated, had no choice, or couldn't get condoms - for those in the know it's a feckin' travesty.

He is always posting about his love of BB including BB Anal, he is the most pro-BB poster on here now IMO. He often equats it with being hit by a bus and clearly has no thought for his own health and more worringly those he is shagging BB and who they shag on so on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so in fact what is being said is "We will allow a service provider to advertise that she "enjoys BB", but not allow a service provider to advertise that she "enjoys BB"". I suppose that there is some logic in there somewhere, but I have to admit that currently it eludes me, although I expect that it is a no brainer actually.

One reason might be to reduce their association with BB via google and so on?The profile is entered as plain text and maybe harder to hide from search engines? But it's just a guess. Perhaps they want to do some damage limitation - either to discourage emphasis on BB for health reasons or slightly more likely for legal reasons. I don't know. But one look at their Terms & Conditions suggested to me they know how to use steel and titanium plating when it comes to covering their bottoms. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so in fact what is being said is “We will allow a service provider to advertise that she “enjoys BB”, but not allow a service provider to advertise that she “enjoys BB””. I suppose that there is some logic in there somewhere, but I have to admit that currently it eludes me, although I expect that it is a no brainer actually.

With apologies to Joseph Heller, That's some catch, that Catch 22. :)

Yeah, I know, it ain't really a Catch 22 situ, but I'm using artistic (autistic? sarcastic?) license [sic].

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With apologies to Joseph Heller, That's some catch, that Catch-22. :)

Yeah, I know, it ain't really a Catch 22 situ, but I'm using artistic (autistic? sarcastic?) license [sic].

B

Not quite a perfect analogy, as you admit. But a clever attempt was one I saw with BB in her likes list but in her profile saying she only did it on videocam with her longterm boyfriend. My guess is A--W don't want to appear to be encouraging unsafe practices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so in fact what is being said is “We will allow a service provider to advertise that she “enjoys BB”, but not allow a service provider to advertise that she “enjoys BB””. I suppose that there is some logic in there somewhere, but I have to admit that currently it eludes me, although I expect that it is a no brainer actually.

Looking at the profile before clicking onto it now doesnt make it obvious the WG is offering BB, whereas previously it was blatantly advertised on the header of her profile or in the text before clicking onto her profile, so to be sure you now have to check her enjoys list. I assume its to do with legal reasons, they certainly havent had a moral objection before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now