enzio

Punters with High Feedback on the Other Site

61 posts in this topic

It was suggested on another thread that Punters having high feedback on the other site might be considered by some WG's as "Slags" and people they would not want to see. Is this seriously true? Are there any WG's that actually think this way? If so, what amounts to high feedback i.e. is a feedback of 10, 50 or 200 high?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If so, what amounts to high feedback i.e. is a feedback of 10, 50 or 200 high?

What do those figures represent please? confirmed/actual appointments? marks out of some figure? or what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This never enters my mind although I have jokingly referred to the odd client seeing other ladies as "toming around", but that's used in friendly banter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do those figures represent please? confirmed/actual appointments? marks out of some figure? or what?

I suppose I was thinking of the number of feedbacks that a punter has received on the other site from escorts. However, even if they related to the number of escorts that a punter has actually seen what would be a "high" figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The booking system allows both parties to leave feedback on each other, so girl will usually confirm he turned up, was genuine etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's purely a clients choice, mostly I grocery shop at Morrisons because it's handy, sometimes it ASDA, Tescos or where ever is handy. I have lots of regulars, however I presume that some do see other ladies, it's nothing to do with me if they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However, even if they related to the number of escorts that a punter has actually seen what would be a "high" figure.

Thank you, assuming that it does represent the number of actual/confirmed appointments, then "Slag" or otherwise, the higher the better I would have thought, with no real upper limit, after all a punter with say 200 genuine punts under his belt is money on the hoof and not to be sneered at IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you, assuming that it does represent the number of actual/confirmed appointments, then "Slag" or otherwise, the higher the better I would have thought, with no real upper limit, after all a punter with say 200 genuine punts under his belt is money on the hoof and not to be sneered at IMHO.

Or would some WG's think safety first and a punter with 200 positive feedbacks is likely to be more dirty (not that I would agree with that view) and not someone they would want to take a risk with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know where all these very 'round the corner' thoughts are coming from but they don't occur to me. Then again I don't think I've seen anyone with 200 feedbacks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or would some WG's think safety first and a punter with 200 positive feedbacks is likely to be more dirty (not that I would agree with that view) and not someone they would want to take a risk with?

Possibly, however if an appointment is made with a punter who does not have an "account" or does have an "account" but with no feedback, how is she going to know his punting history? Every punter is a risk in one way or another irrespective of feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Possibly, however if an appointment is made with a punter who does not have an "account" or does have an "account" but with no feedback, how is she going to know his punting history? Every punter is a risk in one way or another irrespective of feedback.

Indeed, and the fact is in my area, London, requiring feedback is not necessary, 500 ish punts off A/W proves that to me, and i have no feedback and never have had. As i only punt with those ladies with phone numbers i dont even need to log-in to locate them.

Any punter or WG could be fucking anyone BB or doing anything for all any of us know, having or not having feedback proves fuck all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found feedback useful for purging out the timewasters. Having feedback to me is a kind of insurance that someone is likely to be geniune and accountable should something happen. It is not fool proof though and is not a guarantee, just an added extra when considering a meet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The booking system allows both parties to leave feedback on each other, so girl will usually confirm he turned up, was genuine etc.

Never met anybody with 200 feedbacks or anything close to it! The guy with most feedbacks who contacted me (he had 25 -all positive). He said he is a surgeon but his email was so shockingly bad (grammar wise) written, for suppose to be well educated guy, it put me off.

In response to him I asked if he is a "tree surgeon", and of course I never heard from him again. :D.

The client with most feedback I've seen from аdultwork had 20 feedbacks, and yes.. he was a bog standard very typical punter. (at the worst and the best sense of it). I rather have a manwhore. (there is a difference for me)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In response to him I asked if he is a "tree surgeon", and of course I never heard from him again. :D.

LOL@Xenia, I like your style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The client with most feedback I've seen from аdultwork had 20 feedbacks, and yes.. he was a bog standard very typical punter. (at the worst and the best sense of it). I rather have a manwhore. (there is a difference for me)

You can't count Xenia .. I just looked ... :D it was more like 35 .... :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything we can't find to be cynical or negative about on here? :D

I haven't counted my (entirely positive) feedbacks on The Other Site - maybe eight or nne - but I value them as an indication of, I suppose, my integrity to other ladies I might book with. They don't, not surprisingly, represent every WG I've seen, and most, though not all, are in response to (or at least mirror) positive reports I've given the ladies.

WGs often don't have much to go on when deciding whether to see a new clietn. Surely a full profile including feedback from other ladies must help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to him I asked if he is a "tree surgeon", and of course I never heard from him again. :D.

Oh Xenia that's hilarious! lmao

P.s. Can you ask him to come and sort out my eucalyptus tree, it's massive. Ta x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any punter or WG could be fucking anyone BB or doing anything for all any of us know, having or not having feedback proves fuck all.

Yes, spot on.

Feedback for punters is too stupid for words.

Whatever next, you go into Harrods to but something and they want references from Selfridges. :D:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you've got or ever had a landline, mobile contract, anything on HP and a good many other items that aren't, you'll have been credit-checked: despite not always requiring 'credit'.

Most girls agencies also give you a landline tel number check if you're booking an outcall.

Some verification, no matter how fakeable, is usually better than none at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....500 ish punts off A/W proves that to me, and i have no feedback and never have had.

Smitty: you've had 500 just off AWk?!!?

That's got to be £50k, if not more > surely putting you at top-table of heavyweight punteurs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, if you've got or ever had a landline, mobile contract, anything on HP and a good many other items that aren't, you'll have been credit-checked: despite not always requiring 'credit'.

Obtaining credit and booking a prostitute are two totally different concepts, I don't need a reference to obtain paid sex. :D:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a beautiful Uni student who started a few weeks ago. She will only see people who have good feedback, end of story. She's is quite exceptional, as are quite a few Uni students up here.

I saw a girl (several times) who charges an extra 25% for people without a profile, and only if she likes the sound of you.

A regular I have had longer than anyone else, once said, "I know you see other girls . . ." She said it without any disapproval, jealousy or anything. I had always made it clear that I 'see other girls.' But I could sense a bit of emotion there. It's not exactly being jealous, but if you have a customer you quite like and get on with, and especially if you don't see that many customers anyway, it's quite understandable to feel a twinge maybe. (I recall a WG on here making a similar point quite a long time ago.)

For that reason, I use a mix of 'through the system' bookings and telephone-only bookings. But that's just me, and it applies very much to where I stay, the WG scene here, and so on. Somewhere else and I might find it inappropriate or redundant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...and a good many other items that aren't, you'll have been credit-checked: despite not always requiring 'credit'.

Most girls agencies also give you a landline tel number check if you're booking an outcall.

I know its a chore Jim, but do read.

...I don't need a reference to obtain paid sex.

Evidently in some places / with some people - you do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidently in some places / with some people - you do.

There must be 20,000 prostitutes on ADULTW0RK, I don't think I will have a problem finding girls who don't need a reference. :D:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There must be 20,000 prostitutes on ADULTW0RK, I don't think I will have a problem finding girls who don't need a reference. :D:rolleyes:

Quite right. I think I'm fortunate in Edinburgh as it's easy enough to screen the numbers and generally get good quality at a decent price. I'm not overly keen on making a big deal of things - as I've quoted often, a WG should be delivered at the back with the milk, so to speak. I'm not going to get obsessive over it.

But where there is advantage with little or no extra effort I'm all for it. In London, it even means less effort. A very nice nightclub manager gives me recommendations of unlisted girls who basically don't want to risk meeting ungentlemanly behaviour, so it's by personal recommendation so to speak. Which is good for me, cos otherwise London is too big to research for short occasional trips (LMP, and HOD if I make it to Kensington some time, sound fine). One can empty ones balls in teh company of decent girls and not worry about being ripped off.

On the other hand, I'm sure many of us have met a beautiful new escort and wondered how long she'll last before some crass bas*ard ruins it for everyone by being such an arse that she gives up on the business altogether. So as long as I'm convinced that there's no middleman making a profit, which I am with my London contact, then networking seems quite useful. The only 'reference' is someone knowing you personally. (And in case anyone is thinking of PM'ing me, knowing someone online doesn't count in my books.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now