johnc0tt

when is an escort a prostitute

Do you see girls who only let you cum once then want you to leave   87 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you see girls who only let you cum once then want you to leave

    • yes
      6
    • no
      116
    • dont care
      25

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

184 posts in this topic

i believe a prostitute to be someone who sells sex for cash. Escort sells her time and just happens to provide sex.

When using a lady for services I always try to ensure that they provide multi cum as I feel girls who offer a cum and go service are not providing an escort service more of a prostitution service and that they are more interested in the cash than the client. I know every girl wants the cash but sometimes us guys like to feel we have had value for money.

Does anyone else have a preference on multi cum or are they happy with cum and go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i believe a prostitute to be someone who sells sex for cash. Escort sells her time and just happens to provide sex.

When using a lady for services I always try to ensure that they provide multi cum as I feel girls who offer a cum and go service are not providing an escort service more of a prostitution service and that they are more interested in the cash than the client. I know every girl wants the cash but sometimes us guys like to feel we have had value for money.

Does anyone else have a preference on multi cum or are they happy with cum and go.

Cool this is such good news. I can now say to my mum there is no need to be ashamed of me I am not a prostitute I am an Escort as I allow men multi cum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bet your mum will be so pleased.....;) this post is not meant as an offence to anyone, just a personal preference to multi cum girls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that poll has a section missed out. I'm sure a fair few have seen girls not realising that would be the experience they would have, so they have seen girls but would not repeat the experience?

It is also a difficult one if there has been a lack of communication, as no two men are the same. How is the wg supposed to know that you can only cum once for instance? Or if you are able to cum several times. With knowledge like this it is possible to set the pace and get the best experience, but otherwise it can result in a less than satisfactory meet, which isn't really the fault of the girl. For instance if the guy cums quickly and there is still 45 mins to ride, how is she meant to know that is you done?

There is also the condom thing. Some men find it very difficult to cum while wearing a condom, so prefer not to finish with penetration. Again, I think this should be made clear, as where it may be deemed as a problem, it can also be used to keep the pace and stop premature ejaculation.

I guess what I'm trying to say is don't always assume that the lady is trying to 'push and go', as she does not know how your body works as well as you do and you would benefit from spending some time discussing this before the meet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any person who provides sexual services in exchange for monetary reward is a prostitute. Call it what you will, it doesn't change the facts.

Some people seem to have difficulty accepting that they use the services of prostitutes, however. If calling her an 'escort' who just happens to have sex with you makes you feel better, so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree it can be difficult for the lady to judge, but there are some girls that once a guy cums they are quite happy to massage or even try to get him hard again. I have seen some girls who once you have cum , whip the condom off or rush to toilet to dispose of the cum and then come back fully dressed holding the door open for you to leave. These are the ladies i would describe as cum and go punts and this is not for me. These girls remind me of the street workers i used to visit years ago, but now I prefer to pay for the time and whatever happens happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any person who provides sexual services in exchange for monetary reward is a prostitute. Call it what you will, it doesn't change the facts.

Some people seem to have difficulty accepting that they use the services of prostitutes, however. If calling her an 'escort' who just happens to have sex with you makes you feel better, so be it.

Thank you for being the voice of reason. There are many words other than 'prostitute' for those who sell sex for money. Escort is not one of them.

A further defeat for the politically correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont care what they call themselves I just think that there are 2 types of lady out there, one who takes the cash and makes sure the punter enjoys himself fully and the lady who just wants the cash and the punter out the door as quick as possible. "Friendly" is a word I like to use when writing reports on any lady i have visited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i dont care what they call themselves I just think that there are 2 types of lady out there, one who takes the cash and makes sure the punter enjoys himself fully and the lady who just wants the cash and the punter out the door as quick as possible. "Friendly" is a word I like to use when writing reports on any lady i have visited.

We may fall into two types - but we are all prostitutes.

If your thread was about 'Ladies who don't clockwatch' or 'Ladies who let you cum more than once' then you should have said that, not asked 'When is an escort a prostitiute'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i believe a prostitute to be someone who sells sex for cash. Escort sells her time and just happens to provide sex.

When using a lady for services I always try to ensure that they provide multi cum as I feel girls who offer a cum and go service are not providing an escort service more of a prostitution service and that they are more interested in the cash than the client. I know every girl wants the cash but sometimes us guys like to feel we have had value for money.

Does anyone else have a preference on multi cum or are they happy with cum and go.

A female who offers you sexual services in exchange for money, goods or services in return is a prostitute.

What you are questioning here are the services provided by a prostitute. We all work in different ways. A girl who offers a quick gobble behind a bush for a fiver is a prostitute , a girl who gets flown around the world by millionaires and showered with diamonds and wads of cash in exchange for a quick gobble in the private jet is a prostitute. Everyone else is somewhere in the middle, oh and by the way, a whore is a prostitute or a man who frequents prostitutes, we are all in the same happy boat.lol.xx

Lord above, how many times does it have to be said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any person who provides sexual services in exchange for monetary reward is a prostitute. Call it what you will, it doesn't change the facts.

Excellent post, nothing I can add to that. ;);)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any person who provides sexual services in exchange for monetary reward is a prostitute. Call it what you will, it doesn't change the facts.

Some people seem to have difficulty accepting that they use the services of prostitutes, however. If calling her an 'escort' who just happens to have sex with you makes you feel better, so be it.

We do tend to pussyfoot about in the words we use and this is perhaps as much to save the feelings of the girl as to make ourselves feel better .

I refer to a prostitute as a Working Girl (WG) because I think that the word prostitute is used more for street girls .

Do WGs find the word prostitute offensive ?.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, no.

I know what I am and I am comfortable with it.

I do, however, avoid using the word with clients - because YOU GUYS don't seem to like it at all. If I had a penny for every time a client has said 'Oh! Don't say that - you're not a prostitute; you're an escort/wg/floozy (whatever)' - I'd have... lots of pennies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I refer to a prostitute as a Working Girl (WG) because I think that the word prostitute is used more for street girls .

Oh dear ------------ whether the girl charges £500 an hour or £5 in the back of a car makes no difference, they are both prostitutes, only difference is the price.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i believe a prostitute to be someone who sells sex for cash. Escort sells her time and just happens to provide sex.

This :-

(2) In those sections "prostitute" means a person (A) who, on at least one occasion and whether or not compelled to do so, offers or provides sexual services to another person in return for payment or a promise of payment to A or a third person; and "prostitution" is to be interpreted accordingly.

(3) In subsection (2), "payment" means any financial advantage, including the discharge of an obligation to pay or the provision of goods or services (including sexual services) gratuitously or at a discount.

is the current definition of a "prostitute", it is taken from the Sexual Offences Act 2003, it is used in all sections and parts where reference is made to "prostitute". I think you will find that it covers all the euphemisms quite adequately.

The bit that I find interesting is "who, on at least one occasion and whether or not compelled to do so", I've never been able to work out why that was included, or for what purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the point of the title when the poll was about something different?;):confused:

Any Escort, WG, Masseuse etc that provides a sexual act or acts in exchange for money is a prostitute. Some lapdancers also provide sexual services and as such are then prostitutes.

Clue me in someone as I am clearly missing the point here:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly the most pointless and ridiculous thread for a long while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We do tend to pussyfoot about in the words we use and this is perhaps as much to save the feelings of the girl as to make ourselves feel better .

I refer to a prostitute as a Working Girl (WG) because I think that the word prostitute is used more for street girls .

Do WGs find the word prostitute offensive ?.

How the hell is it saving the feelings of the girl if you describe her of being lower in calibre and not worthy of the hallowed (lmao) title of "escort" simply because she only allows a guy to come once in certain time restraints.???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for being the voice of reason. There are many words other than 'prostitute' for those who sell sex for money. Escort is not one of them.

A further defeat for the politically correct.

The original meaning may perhaps not have referenced to prostitutes although where the proof is that the original title holders did NOT have sex with their clients is i really dont know. The word now though is a commonly used name for those that sell their bodies for monetary purposes, meanings change over time and words are often evolved to cover other meanings, its how we got our language in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What was the point of the title when the poll was about something different?;):confused:

Any Escort, WG, Masseuse etc that provides a sexual act or acts in exchange for money is a prostitute. Some lapdancers also provide sexual services and as such are then prostitutes.

Clue me in someone as I am clearly missing the point here:confused:

Im with you here Ghengis, i dont think we are missing the point though, i think the OP may be though.x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How the hell is it saving the feelings of the girl if you describe her of being lower in calibre and not worthy of the hallowed (lmao) title of "escort" simply because she only allows a guy to come once in certain time restraints.???

I did not say anything about a guy cumming once , twice or whatever , but I can understand and excuse your confusion and misinterpretation of my post , as the poll attached to this thread asks a different question to the thread title .

As for words taking on a different meaning in time , I still , being of that old school , don't feel comfortable using the word 'escort ' as it still suggests companionship , in a non-sexual way , to me .

I don't feel comfortable using the word 'prostitute ' either as it has low undertones similar to harlot or whore .

WG seems to me to be a respectful middle ground description .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What was the point of the title when the poll was about something different?;):confused:

Any Escort, WG, Masseuse etc that provides a sexual act or acts in exchange for money is a prostitute. Some lapdancers also provide sexual services and as such are then prostitutes.

Clue me in someone as I am clearly missing the point here:confused:

Exactly my thoughts, well said Ghenghis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't feel comfortable using the word 'prostitute ' either as it has low undertones similar to harlot or whore .

WG seems to me to be a respectful middle ground description .

Blimey, I thought fluffies had all disappeared. WG is a total misnomer covering essentially every woman/girl in work - and as stay-at-home mothers would say 'us too.'

This flight to euphemistic language is regretable. Prostitutes are prostitutes and, as the oldest profession should be proud to be so alled.

Get comfortable with clear English and leave the social workers their job of inventing 'nice' titles for jobs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blimey, I thought fluffies had all disappeared. WG is a total misnomer covering essentially every woman/girl in work - and as stay-at-home mothers would say 'us too.'

This flight to euphemistic language is regretable. Prostitutes are prostitutes and, as the oldest profession should be proud to be so alled.

Get comfortable with clear English and leave the social workers their job of inventing 'nice' titles for jobs.

If WGs are happy to be referred to as prostitutes on these boards then I have no problem with using the word myself .

Words do take on slightly different meanings as time and society advance .

Whilst I have no desire to reopen the 'high class 'debate , I do tend to associate the word prostitute with 'low class ' street prostitutes and all the unpleasant images which that nowadays brings up , and not with the ladies who we enjoy a dialogue with on these boards .

I agree that using the words WG is a bit of a cop-out but no more so than escort .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blimey, I thought fluffies had all disappeared.

No: remember that fluffies are part of an all-pervasive cancer-like organism: totally dominating this board and, whilst they're at it, the entire media apparatus in this country and The West at large. Thankfully, there is a small but valiant band of brothers who are immune to these depredations, who tirelessly carry the struggle against the oppressors... (cont p.94)

WG is a total misnomer covering essentially every woman/girl in work - and as stay-at-home mothers would say 'us too.'

'Us to!' - ???

Do you truly believe that any woman would knowingly clamour for the right to self-identify as a working-girl, when the overwhelming majority will know that it is almost universally accepted term for a WG and has been so for a long time now? They would not make that mistake and neither should you.

Working-woman, or Working-mum - maybe. Working-girl? - not unless they wanted to identify as being a prostitute or sex-escort.

This flight to euphemistic language is regretable. Prostitutes are prostitutes and, as the oldest profession should be proud to be so alled.

Get comfortable with clear English and leave the social workers their job of inventing 'nice' titles for jobs.

I get what you're driving a Scorchin', and maybe even sympathize with some of it, but in your quest for upholding absolute fidelty to an unchanging form of the English language as it was taught to you, you may find yourself becoming left-behind... if you are not already so.

There is a good reason why, say, a white man would nowadays do well to avoid insisting on openly referring to black people as being Negroes, even though once-upon-a-time using 'black' was deemed to be less respectful - and despite it connoting almost the same meaning in its' languages of origin.

If in doubt, you can also try out 'Spastic' for size. Correct it may be - but rarely welcome nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now