bethom

Paying 300 pounds plus for an escort

224 posts in this topic

I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

IMHO. If you mean £400/hour then he is just plain stupid. If you mean £400 for three hours (although what the hell you do for more than an hour beats me) it might be just about acceptable.

Any fool can spend what he likes on what he wants - but it takes a clever man to know the value of the goods and services he is buying.

Perhaps my biggest objection is that it gives the prostitutes (let's use an honest word) the feeling that they are 'worth' more and the poor bloke, struggling on £20,000/year finds his local prostitutes are pushing up their prices. What prostitutes don't realise is that they have an in-built reluctance to lower their prices when there is a downturn in the economy and many find work hard to come by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

Because we don't have limitless cash, and so try to get value for money? And the reality is that for a man of my modest means and vanilla tastes £300 (assuming that's an hourly rate) is a bit steep.

Not that I have an issue with anybody charging whatever they can get away with for providing a service (of any kind). If a lady can get that then good luck to her - it's just that I personally I am not in the £300 ph market, so I certainly would baulk at it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

As the other posters have stated, this distorts the market. There are thousands of lovely top notch girls who charge £150 an hour. For me, the guys who do this are quite simply on an ego trip. They have the money and they want to show they are above everyone else. The girls who charge this rate are not likely to be any better than those that charge half or a third of these amounts. I suspect the girls who charge these rates know damn well that the guys are more turned on by the fact they have money and have paid 3 times the market rate, than they are by the quality of the service itself.

Of course, these guys and girls will always exist but most of us on this board will understand we probably get a better service at less than half this rate from a woman who isn't a premier league type prima donna. It would actually turn me off to be with a girl who has a "I can charge £500 per hour attitude" :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

Having paid £350 an hour more than once and £300 an hour as well in the past i know paying more has no connection whatsoever to the quality or quantity of the service the WG offers. I have had equally good or better punts at £100 an hour because its the WGs attitude that defines a punt, paying more wont change a bad attitude, or change a lady from one who gives a half hearted service into one who is very enthusiastic and friendly. Another myth is WGs who charge more are more beautiful, absolute rubbish, i have punted with stunners at the £100-150 an hour range numerous times, any punter that falls for that is very much mistaken.

Its of course up to the punter what he pays as it is what WGs charge, but this board can help advise the punter of things he might not realize, whether he takes the advice is up to him obviously. Many on here have believed there is a link and that to them logic dictates that by paying £300 they must be in for a better punt than if they paid £100, this isnt the case in punting, there really is no link because unlike buying a Ferrari which you know is better than a Fiesta, WGs are individual human beings who cant be so easily pigeonholed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£10 for a rubbish handjob = not worth Tesco's special offer of the day round mine, 425g x 3 packs of chicken fillet strips.

£100 for a rubbish handjob, with an agency stunna = lots of chicken fillet strips you would think, wasted on a rubbish punt. If it was less than 100% chicken or genuine PSE, go to Asda or Milton Keynes. Don't complain, this isn't VAT, it's tax on you being a cretin. Rolleyes.

Girls can price themselves as they please. Nobody should take issue with it, or call their clients stupid it they enjoy themselves, or call the girls overpriced mingers, I found a girl who looks the same in Luton who's cheaper". So what.

£500 for an experience. Over a course of several years, lapping round the circuit and experimenting, you will have experienced a handjob worth £500 for £10, an hour's worth of agency joy and happy memories ever after for the wankbank at £350, and horror at £120 that may have put you off sex for life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What prostitutes don't realise is that they have an in-built reluctance to lower their prices when there is a downturn in the economy and many find work hard to come by.

I do actually agree with S here in the general principle that many people -whether WG's (for let us use a thoroughly dishonest term) or not, are often to reluctant to do what might improve their lot (assuming that they're struggling to begin with).

But, on the whole this post just reminds me of the saying that Wall Street is the only place where people who can afford Rolls Royces are expected to listen to financial advice from people who can't.

Change Wall Street to PN and you get the picture. :D

.....and the poor bloke, struggling on £20,000/year finds his local prostitutes are pushing up their prices..

:D It's the way you tell them

But seriously: applying the same logic as you employ above (ie struggling WG's should lower their prices to attract more custom) - surely then, if our poor bloke punter on a meagre £20k, can't afford the prices, then he should follow your advice and cut his cloth to suit his means and should either work harder / and longer hours / or suck his bosses willy to get a payrise ;), or p*ss-off and do the crossword instead?

Sorry to appear so antagonistic. I'm not really: I just disagree with many of your views on these types of subjects. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Hephaestion;49

But seriously: applying the same logic as you employ above (ie struggling WG's should lower their prices to attract more custom) - surely then' date=' if our poor bloke punter on a meagre £20k, can't afford the prices, then he should follow your advice and cut his cloth to suit his means and should either [b']work harder / and longer hours / or suck his bosses willy to get a payrise ;), or p*ss-off and do the crossword instead?

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It goes without saying that WGs can set whatever prices they please - but I'd certainly baulk at £300/hr. Even for that mythical guy earning £60k (1 in 20 of the working population) with f*ck all ties, that's just burning money for the hell of it in my view.

Also not sure if it's just me, but the line "I'm such a once in a lifetime experience that I'm worth £300-£500/hr" sounds like a ego unrestrained. Come on - £85 would cover Kitty from Berkshire Belles/HoD for half an hour and a Chicken Tikka Kebab ;) Beat that for the best way to spend an hour.

PS I have spent £300/hr once before. Punt was average and rather than a "happy memories ever after" event, it was more like a dawning horror that I was stupid enough to blow that amount of cash. A fool and his money etc etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As to the guy on £20,000 - perhaps he should not be punting!

If he is struggling to afford the punt, then I agree - whilst adding that I used to foolishly think I could afford to when, in fact, I would have been wiser (financially) not to.

I thnk you are partly missing my point. I don't think I said anything about the guy on £20,000 a year other than that he loses out if local prostitutes raise their prices because their sisters do so
.

And for the would-be punter, that is too bad. But if the WG's are not struggling (and many appear not to be), then, that's still.... too bad.

More importantly, I repeat, prostitutes who do raise their prices face a problem in accepting the need to cut prices if their market share is falling.
But I think that is generally understood accepted! Can I ask (not antagonistically - I promise ;) ) why you might think that they might not fully understand this risk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IMHO. If you mean £400/hour then he is just plain stupid. If you mean £400 for three hours (although what the hell you do for more than an hour beats me) it might be just about acceptable.

Really? Its really not much of a mystery. Some guys have exceptional stamina. Others that prefer longer appointments like more "slow burn" experiences and services such as wine and dine before, plenty of foreplay, massage, fantasy role play, etc.

Really its as simple as different people valuing different things.... its a well established phenomena.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It goes without saying that WGs can set whatever prices they please - but I'd certainly baulk at £300/hr. Even for that mythical guy earning £60k (1 in 20 of the working population) with f*ck all ties, that's just burning money for the hell of it in my view.

Also not sure if it's just me, but the line "I'm such a once in a lifetime experience that I'm worth £300-£500/hr" sounds like a ego unrestrained. Come on - £85 would cover Kitty from Berkshire Belles/HoD for half an hour and a Chicken Tikka Kebab ;) Beat that for the best way to spend an hour.

PS I have spent £300/hr once before. Punt was average and rather than a "happy memories ever after" event, it was more like a dawning horror that I was stupid enough to blow that amount of cash. A fool and his money etc etc

Your last paragraph sums my realisation up from a long time ago, i could then and can now afford to punt at £300 an hour or double that if i wished but it isnt in anyway necessary to do so, it is pissing money away for nothing extra in return over what i know i can get by paying £100-150 an hour. Much preferable to me is to have two £100-150 an hour punts, just because someone can afford something doesnt mean they dont want VFM as they see it, and i always require VFM nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It goes without saying that WGs can set whatever prices they please - but I'd certainly baulk at £300/hr. Even for that mythical guy earning £60k (1 in 20 of the working population) with f*ck all ties, that's just burning money for the hell of it in my view.

And the rest of your post, I would agree. Escorts are like face creams, skin care products and facials (no, no pun intended). Luxury products, and are you worth it? Hell yes, I've had a crap day at the office.

Excerpted from Beauty Scoop: The Indispensable Guide to the Best Beauty Products on the Market by Julia Carling, Kate Shapland.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BEAUTY SCOOP : SKIN CARE : CHAPTER INTRODUCTION

Of all the things that are said about beauty (quite a lot of which are complete baloney), the truest is that your skin care routine should be as simple as you can make it.

So why is it made out to be so complicated?

Because your face has the lion's share of 'problems' that's why. Think about it: as well as spots and dry patches, there are wrinkles and fine lines, patchy pigmentation, sagging, crepeyness, 'big' pores and the 'problem' skin types - oily and dry - to deal with. And if we are to believe all we read, every one of these is treatable with cosmetics.

Add to this the fact that there is a lot of money to be made if a beauty company can make us believe that their products will make us more beautiful and not age so fast.

No wonder so many of you are confused about what you can expect and achieve with skin care products. The responses we got to our survey show that you are not very clear about basic stuff like your skin type (are you oily [PSE], dry [GFE] or combination [i don't care as long as it's pussy] - or all three at different times of the month or year?), how long you should use a product before you see a positive difference in your skin (one reason why lots of you like products which give instant results - because you can actually see something happening [it got erect and job done, I'm happy]), and in which order you should be tackling problems like dark circles, puffiness, wrinkles [titwanks, tennis] and sagging.

What you need is some long overdue objective advice - which is exactly what we are here to give - and impartial opinions on the products that work best - which is what our testers (women like yourselves) have supplied. This is the only way to cut through the hype and find out how to give your skin what it needs without overcomplicating things and wasting money on products that will just gather dust in your bathroom [like Vaseline].

If you want the most unbiased advice on skin care and products, you have come to the right place.

Some of the things you will find out in this chapter:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? Its really not much of a mystery. Some guys have exceptional stamina. Others that prefer longer appointments like more "slow burn" experiences and services such as wine and dine before, plenty of foreplay, massage, fantasy role play, etc.

Really its as simple as different people valuing different things.... its a well established phenomena.

Indeed it is. Others on here ask the same question but with anything over half hour punts instead of an hour. They fail to see that anyone can be different to themselves and they automatically consider the punter who punts longer than them is in their terms a fluffy. It is such utter bollocks and untrue.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never understood why many baulk at this. ;)

Say a guy was single, had no children, and had no mortgage. And he earned about 60,000 pounds a year. And say also he had a a regular escort he visited, and paid 400 pounds a time to see her.

He can afford it, and he he gets a good service from her, so there shouldn't be an issue. It should be the case that a person can choose any price they want, if they are willing to pay the price?

The vast majority of men are not banker wankers.

Most men have the sense to spend money wisely.

Of course, call girls have the right to charge whatever rate they choose and men have the right to ignore that rate.

There are a lot of call girls with high rates and dusty phones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even for that mythical guy earning £60k (1 in 20 of the working population) with f*ck all ties, that's just burning money for the hell of it in my view.

Hi JP.

Working (albeit v. loosely) on your figures:

28 million workforce x 5% = 1.4million peeps

/2 (female earners) = 750k men earning £60k+

"f*ck all ties" = 10%? (21.6m married or co-habiting people in the entire UK population - (2001 census here). & remember many punters are in a relationship) = 75k men earning £60k+.

I think that's making some pretty big allowances.

Now go research "how many men claim to have punted" & "how many men actively punt" along with this board's delightfully titled "How long can you save your spunk?".

... and I'm guessing there's still a market of many, many thousansds of paying punters desparate to 'unload' - each and every week, if not more often.

Come on - £85 would cover xxx from Belles/HoD for half an hour and a Chicken Tikka Kebab ;) Beat that for the best way to spend an hour.

Hmmm - if you say so. But half an hour with a real beauty, even if preceded by a visit to Belles/HoD :D is not my idea of great time.

PS I have spent £300/hr once before. Punt was average and rather than a "happy memories ever after" event, it was more like a dawning horror that I was stupid enough to blow that amount of cash. A fool and his money etc etc

Me too. But then I've also had belters at that rate. And I'm also satisfiable with a HE massage at a much lower rate.

But perhaps that's the main thing being expressed by the many who seem to have a problem that some people charge so much for their services. They are ashamed that they have been made a fool-of.

Who exactly do we think is watching-over and keeping tabs of all of this foolishness?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Others on here ask the same question but with anything over half hour punts instead of an hour. They fail to see that anyone can be different to themselves and they automatically consider the punter who punts longer than them is in their terms a fluffy. It is such utter bollocks and untrue.;)

...... not 'arf!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But half an hour with a real beauty .... is not my idea of great time.

Say what? I grant you - half an hour isn't much time to discuss (say) the risks of a coalition government with a WG on a punt (or whatever people find to fill the time on a 4 hour meeting - beats me) but really - a beauty, 30 minutes and that isn't your idea of a great time??? Nope - lost on me ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of call girls with high rates and dusty phones.

Absolutely brilliant, one of the best things I have ever read on here. ;);)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like paying £150, let alone £300 for an hour.

But, I also don't understand people who spend thousands on fixing up cars with lights and sound systems.

If you got the cash and it is what you want, then go for it! Each man to his own.

I can only afford 1 punt a month if I want to save for Uni. But then, I don't really feel the need for anything more often than that.

I think those who mock the high spenders and the high chargers are just jealous and are as much at the mercy of their egos as the guys they mock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think those who mock the high spenders and the high chargers are just jealous and are as much at the mercy of their egos as the guys they mock.

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried, why on earth would I be jealous of guys who grossly overpay prostitutes. ;)

Let me tell you what I am jealous of ---------- when I pick up a handsome 20 year old guy with his beautiful girlfriend and I know that she is being shagged because she fancies him not because she is being paid. :D:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Escort has no rust and a long MOT, then I think £300 is very reasonable. I know someone who is selling his Mk I for £8,950. One hopes the Escort comes with a full servicing history.

However, some drivers would dispute the term escort described the WG correctly, for the services he hoped that she offered.

In the present economic climate, I am struggling to justify paying £180 to a lovely WG in Watford who is worth the upper end of the fee scale.

£300 an hour is a very heavy investment, especially if the product being sold is previously unknown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the present economic climate, I am struggling to justify paying £180 to a lovely WG in Watford who is worth the upper end of the fee scale.

I know the lady you are talking about, she is certainly 5 stars but out of principle I would not pay her £180 --------- especially as I have seen her in parlours for £80 ----------- that is the downside of giving girls fantastic FR's.;):(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
£10 for a rubbish handjob = not worth Tesco's special offer of the day round mine, 425g x 3 packs of chicken fillet strips.

£100 for a rubbish handjob, with an agency stunna = lots of chicken fillet strips you would think, wasted on a rubbish punt. If it was less than 100% chicken or genuine PSE, go to Asda or Milton Keynes. Don't complain, this isn't VAT, it's tax on you being a cretin. Rolleyes.

Girls can price themselves as they please. Nobody should take issue with it, or call their clients stupid it they enjoy themselves, or call the girls overpriced mingers, I found a girl who looks the same in Luton who's cheaper". So what.

£500 for an experience. Over a course of several years, lapping round the circuit and experimenting, you will have experienced a handjob worth £500 for £10, an hour's worth of agency joy and happy memories ever after for the wankbank at £350, and horror at £120 that may have put you off sex for life.

What the hell are you talking about!? Seriously, most of this post hardly makes any sense :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know the lady you are talking about, she is certainly 5 stars but out of principle I would not pay her £180 --------- especially as I have seen her in parlours for £80 ----------- that is the downside of giving girls fantastic FR's.:D:(

If that is Alex ex of TBL her rate has come down as it was £200 an hour at one time. She certainly offers a great service IMO.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now