Coventrypunter

Photos on Field Reports

16 posts in this topic

What do people think about the idea of putting photos on field reports?

A lady could submit the URL of an image, and it would be saved along with her fr. When the fr is viewed the photo would appear.

The FR author would have the power of veto over the pic so if the photo is seen as inaccurate by him it would be removed.

If the url of the photo (It would be the wg's job to maintain that) was used then there would be no additional disk space or bandwidth required. Rather than Gal having to store loads of images.

also i would have an additional search field so the viewer could chose to only see FR's with photos

Sorry if this is a technical one, mods please move if in the wrong place......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do people think about the idea of putting photos on field reports?

I thought you were going to suggest photos of us punters. The size of the grin indicating how good the punt was :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought you were going to suggest photos of us punters. The size of the grin indicating how good the punt was :P

What a fabulous idea, that way when a lady is slated for not offering dfk despite having it on her profile and the poster says "i have always upheld meticulous oral hygiene" we can see if he has in actual fact got 4 green stumps, cracked lips and a coldsore.:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes definitely. The web is a visual place! In this day and age it amazes me there are not video reviews of escorts :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...... we can see if he has in actual fact got 4 green stumps, cracked lips and a coldsore.:P

Ahh Chloe, you remembered me.......! x;):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ISG Argentina has a mutual secure area for this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do people think about the idea of putting photos on field reports?

A lady could submit the URL of an image, and it would be saved along with her fr. When the fr is viewed the photo would appear.

The FR author would have the power of veto over the pic so if the photo is seen as inaccurate by him it would be removed.

If the url of the photo (It would be the wg's job to maintain that) was used then there would be no additional disk space or bandwidth required. Rather than Gal having to store loads of images.

also i would have an additional search field so the viewer could chose to only see FR's with photos

Sorry if this is a technical one, mods please move if in the wrong place......

Never going to happen. Security risk is too great. There have been examples of spyware embedded in photos on other sites which was designed to access personal information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh Chloe, you remembered me.......! x;):P

Lol, aww shucks, sorry lol.x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't that the point of having photos on their website :-/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do people think about the idea of putting photos on field reports?

A lady could submit the URL of an image, and it would be saved along with her fr. When the fr is viewed the photo would appear.

The FR author would have the power of veto over the pic so if the photo is seen as inaccurate by him it would be removed.

If the url of the photo (It would be the wg's job to maintain that) was used then there would be no additional disk space or bandwidth required. Rather than Gal having to store loads of images.

also i would have an additional search field so the viewer could chose to only see FR's with photos

Sorry if this is a technical one, mods please move if in the wrong place......

Some would be excluded from being allowed or able to submit photos though which might be seen as unfair such as FRs that are on WGs off A/W and work at Soho Walk-Ups as A/W is not allowed to be mentioned in a FR and links are banned, and Soho Walk-Ups have no pictures as dont some Parlours/Agencies that are not on the net yet, and WGs that are located through non net ways, such as Local Newspapers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about adding the price within the "advanced search" fields?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some would be excluded from being allowed or able to submit photos though which might be seen as unfair such as FRs that are on WGs off A/W and work at Soho Walk-Ups as A/W is not allowed to be mentioned in a FR and links are banned, and Soho Walk-Ups have no pictures as dont some Parlours/Agencies that are not on the net yet, and WGs that are located through non net ways, such as Local Newspapers.

Not exactly unfair. Girls who only advertise on аdultwоrк can still upload theirs picture to any image hosting website, and provide the link. Its not necessarily after all!

It is a quite a good idea from Kinky (I would not use it though), as it will be quite convenient to see instantly the image of WG on FRs and then they can decide if they want to look further for more photos on the personal/agency/parlour websites.

Captain69 had it for a while, where some of reviews of the girls displayed one of her photos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not exactly unfair. Girls who only advertise on аdultwоrк can still upload theirs picture to any image hosting website, and provide the link. Its not necessarily after all!

It is a quite a good idea from Kinky (I would not use it though), as it will be quite convenient to see instantly the image of WG on FRs and then they can decide if they want to look further for more photos on the personal/agency/parlour websites.

Captain69 had it for a while, where some of reviews of the girls displayed one of her photos.

I happily stand corrected Xenia as far as A/W ladies are concerned, i wonder if Kinky will run this past Galahad.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds a little problematic to me. The time consumption of one person recieving numerous pictures from a second source (ie the wg) and then matching it to the pending FR and then having to have the report writer verify that it is of a recent likeness and what if they disagree? How many times can the one picture be submitted before Galahad tears his hair out with exasperation? I think having links to websites is a method that works well and if it isn't broken?

If a FR interests you and there is a number at hand, there is no one stopping you calling her up and asking her if there is a link where you can view her. It is a much easier method than sifting though hundreds of pictures that may not be suitable by one man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now