No. 115697 - Published 5 Jan 2014
Review of Coco of London
Details of Service Provider
Live Cam Girls
These live models are online now - just click an image to go straight to their chat room
Nice room- strange lay out really, had its own ensuite, but I didn't see any kitchen so I can only assume that the this is shared. My guess would be that there are a few girls all working at this same place in different rooms. Easy to find (perhaps a bit exposed) half way between Notting Hill Gate and Queensway tube.
Her most recent pictures don't do her justice and make her look "plastic", I found her much prettier in real life. She has a very nice body, very slim and a very nice set of fake boobs very loft (unlike some implants). From what I recall seemed taller than agency profile would suggest
If I recall correctly she was from Lao.
Her most recent pictures don't do her justice and make her look "plastic", I found her much prettier in real life.
She has a very nice body, very slim and a very nice set of fake boobs very Soft (unlike some implants).
The service was generally very good. We started with some deep kissing and fondling, reverse oral and BBBJ (She asked whether I wanted CBJ or BBBJ- an easy decision)
The first negative was that she wouldn't let me finger her pussy inside. It was very strange to be honest every time I tried to put my finger inside she started giggling, like she was being tickled - so playful and fun but not PSE
After continued BBBJ I asked to cum on her face which she declined (again not very PSE), said she never does this, but she agreed to let me cum in her mouth- again a slight negative
We then chatted for a few minutes, I had some wine and then she gave me a very good massage (one of the bonuses with some Asian escorts)
On to round 2 and I asked whether I could fuck her ass, she said no despite her being advertised as an "A Level Expert"!!!. I suggested that I would go slow and start with my fingers and a small toy to "warm her up" but again she said no. This was most disappointing aspect for me. I had initially wanted to meet another escort from the same Agency called Cherry who had a reputation for being good at Anal but she was currently on tour in Birmingham. The polite man from the agency was very helpful and friendly and gave me the names of a few alternatives who might provide a similar service and Coco was one of these names. I had therefore chosen her specifically for her A level Expert Tag and the recommendation from the Agency. Therefore for Anal not to be on offer was a big disappointment and if she had not been such a nice girl it would have ruined the session completely. She did let me play with her Ass a bit but was very tense about it, and pulled some of the strangest sex faces I have ever seen
Instead we went to straight sex, in a number of positions and I must admit she was fairly good, responsive to my thrusts, continued to kiss throughout, and really let me pound away. Came again and quick clean up. I would say she seemed very concerned about the condom might(it didn't) break and kept mentioning babies (not a turn on for me lol)
Managed to get hard again very quickly and went for pop no 3. Although time was running low she did not clock watch and I think we perhaps overran by 5- 10 minutes. Fucked her like crazy in Doggy but to help me cum again she also wanked me off.
All in all was not a bad session but a huge disappointment that there was no Anal (and to a lesser extent disappointed no facial or fingering) so I have mixed feeling really.
If all the services had been provided I would have certainly recommended her, however because she was fun and friendly and most of the session was good I do not think she falls in to the "not recommended" category.
This was my first time using the agency and I found the agency very helpful and easy to deal with. However Coco incorrectly being labelled as an "A Level Expert", "PSE" and also being recommended specifically leaves me wondering how accurate the services listed by other girls at the agency might be, enough to make me hesitate in using the agency again.
Service Provider's Rebuttal
The agency writes:
Your first call was on 5 December 2013, 23:48hrs, lasted 2:47seconds, and you requested to book Cherry who is listed as Off-duty. You asked if there was a limit on the number of times you can cum in a booking. The receptionist made it clear we only do bookings based solely on duration, and what happens in a booking is entirely at the escort's discretion. You asked for similar providers to Cherry. You were given a short list of escorts that are now visited by previous regular clients of Cherry. This list included Coco and Patsy. The receptionist made the point that similarity depends on the attribute/quality that is being compared. Thus you were asked what you were looking for, so we could better help you with finding an alternative. You replied with a list of ridiculously extreme acts including things like face-f*cking, an*l fisting and other lewd phrases found only on extreme porn sites. The receptionist made it clear that no one would do any of the acts you listed. You got upset
hearing this. The receptionist said you are welcome to give us a call in future if you need further advice.
Your next call was on 6 December 2013, 00:00hrs, lasting 50seconds, and you asked to book Coco for the 11th January. The receptionist said Coco was similar to Cherry in regards to her bubbly character. However, the reception gave clear notification that Coco was temporarily not doing A-level this week, a message Coco had asked for us to pass on to her clients. The receptionist advised against booking Coco and suggested Patsy or Mercedes would be more suitable. You wished to keep with your first choice Coco. You did not give any requests, special preparations or messages for us to pass on to Coco.
In regards to âshe wouldnât let me finger her pussy insideâ, Coco didn't feel your hygiene was acceptable. However you repeatedly tried to do so. Same with A-level, when she said no you still persisted on trying to get her to change her mind. She even gave in slightly as you said âshe did let me play with her Ass a bitâ. You were told at the time of making the booking that Coco wouldn't be suitable if you are looking for A-level on that day, however you still wanted to book her. It seems you either have a complete disregard for her right to decline or are so self-absorbed that you expect to ultimately get your own way no matter how unrealistic your demands are. Irrelevant of how accommodating Coco was, the negative points in your review revolve around disappointment from not getting your way.