No. 120992 - Published 18 Sep 2015
Hot, Latin beauty, curvy and beautiful, as per profile.
Called to book and spoke to one of the other members of their group - a TS in another location. This was the only number available, so had to call back and ask if there was a number for Alexia, which there wasn't apparently. Eventually booked and made arrangements and told to park in an area and then text for further instructions.
After something of a wild goose chase, eventually found the place.
Alexia was beautiful, as expected. Colombian, not Spanish, which is fine by me, but her English was very poor.
I asked for an hour with anal, which according to the profile is £150 and I believe, was confirmed by the English TS when I booked the meet. Alexia seemed to agree with this.
One thing which I found weird, was when I asked to take a shower - Alexia insisted that I take my trousers in with me, because it had my money in the pocket. If I ever felt suspicious of a WG robbing me, I'd walk anyway, plus I'd always check my pockets before leaving an establishment. In any case, I didn't think much more of it at the time.
The session was going OK, with nice oral and some sex, but then, when I asked for anal, I was told that it would either be extra, or that I would have to reduce the meet to half an hour, for £150. Since I'd already mentioned this at the start of the session and when booking, I was a bit pissed off but arguing was futile, due to a language barrier. I can only assume that she either didn't fully understand me during our conversation at the beginning of the session, or that she was simply bumping up the price, half way through. As it turned out I just popped into her asshole, finished off and then went.
It was a shame, because I think that firstly, £150 is a lot to pay for half an hour, even with anal and then also, I'd agreed for the hour when booking, plus the profile agreed with my thinking. I can't help feeling that I was overcharged and that left a very negative impression.
Overall, it was only this which detracted from the punt, hence I've gone with a neutral rating. If the price had been as agreed, I'd have definitely rated positive and would have gone back again. As it is, I'll steer clear and would recommend that other punters just get 100% clarity about what is involved, before punting.