No. 56750 - Published 28 Aug 2005
Babes 2 is on a busy road but has a private car park and entrance at the rear. It's as nice as the Manchester branch of Babes but the rooms are somewhat plainer (at least the one I was in was plainer). Showers in rooms, clean + tidy.
Young, slim blonde lady with natural breasts. Physically, very attractive. Conversation pretty minimal.
Pleasant massage, though I had to ask for something other than talc (talc is a pet hate of mine). Then she turned me over and applied condom immediately which surprised me since I was not yet fully hard. Thus, I assume, OWO is in any case not on the menu (also, no kissing, at least not on the lips). Foxy is actually pretty darn good at the covered oral, though I'm not sure her technique is particularly varied. She's better at this than, say, Cindy of Samantha's, but not as good as Katie or Angel of Sandy's.
Then onto sex, with her on top. This was really quite pleasant, though it's not my favourite position. While the service was not exactly mechanical, it didn't seem hugely enthusiastic. Perhaps I was just disappointed because I had understood her to offer a raunchy service (maybe I misread the label on her picture at the Manchester branch of WFB). Anyway, then onto 69 which was nothing special (though at least she was perfectly clean!), cowgirl again, and then doggie to completion.
I have no specific complaint, and suspect that she's in fact above average. However, since I decide to visit girls on the basis of Punternet FRs and on recommendations from other sites, she's below average for the WGs I've actually seen.
Having said this, she appears to specialise in dressing up and scenarios, which we didn't do and anyway isn't particularly my thing. Maybe if she'd been doing that or it'd been my bag, we'd have been playing to her strengths and this would have been a better report.