Reviews

Surprised to see no reviews posted on site for 2 and a half weeks.

charlieton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Surprised to see no reviews posted on site for 2
> and a half weeks.


Wondering if it's a management decision not to post?Only a handful on AW.

Back on track. 17 more added with a relatively high negative count of 7.

Surprised about the negative for Victoria House but I just wonder if the escort thought it was a half-hour booking rather than the hour paid for and the punter was a bit timid in not pointing out her error (assuming the payment was handled by the desk lady not the escort}. Cannot remember how you pay as a long time time since I've been there but if money for service paid direct to escort, that's a bit odd. Have to have been there to know really.

Me too. Wonder if its the end of a great punting site. The other one is not accepting anyone new and hasn't done so for 6 months so that looks doomed.

Let’s see what happens in the next weeks as life gets back to some normality. The other site referred to above is still going but only if you are a member from about a year ago.

ThomasT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Me too. Wonder if its the end of a great punting
> site. The other one is not accepting anyone new
> and hasn't done so for 6 months so that looks
> doomed.

I would guess not re Punternet. It's survived the problems so far so things should only get better. I also don't think the other site is suffering either but just tightening up on who joins when then had been more new people benefiting but not contributing.

Looks like no reviews are being uploaded ATM. Wonder why

ThomasT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Looks like no reviews are being uploaded ATM.
> Wonder why

If you mean Pnet, they jumped into action almost straightaway after your post, even though it was Christmas Day.

Looked at the 100 most recent Northampton reviews.

88 for Massage Northampton.

They must be doing something right...

Things will get better. Just hang on in there

I am surprised to see that this thread is literally empty, I mean like there's been no review.

I, for one, am not punting at the moment, as it’s far too risky, so no reviews.

Once I get vaccinated and infection rates drop I will be back.

Two reviews from Diva are bouncing on “No report List” and I have three more reviews to submit for them as my experiences and they will probably get rejected for the same reason. I tried searching the forum for any clues as to why that is, and if there was a sentence been given and so on but it does not seem fair to me, and I think the purpose of sites like this is hugely diminished if the best agency in London in: quality, transparency, accuracy of information, excellent customer service is not listed on this platform. It’s against punters interest and the community at large that their reports are not accepted forever. Is this a taboo subject? - I would like it discussed by the community.

Linus

A strong deterrent is needed to prevent rampant abuse of the review system. This is why service providers who write their own (fake) reviews are permanently excluded from PN. We will not discuss specific details or cases in this forum.

---

PunterNet UK Admin Team

I see .. new to the whole hobby so not familiar with the scene before 2020.
I tried using a web crawler called 'Way back machine' that keeps snapshots of open websites like this to get an indication of how the scene was prior to lockdown and even before that but it seems PN requested its details to be excluded, it says: "This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine." which is a shame

Thanks Admin

LinusTesla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I see .. new to the whole hobby so not familiar
> with the scene before 2020.
> I tried using a web crawler called 'Way back
> machine' that keeps snapshots of open websites
> like this to get an indication of how the scene
> was prior to lockdown and even before that but it
> seems PN requested its details to be excluded, it
> says: "This URL has been excluded from the Wayback
> Machine." which is a shame
>
> Thanks Admin

The women who have left the industry and do not want their old profiles and reviews coming to light probably do not think it is a shame.

---

PunterNet UK Admin Team

The other one is not accepting anyone new and hasn't done so for 6 months so that looks doomed.

The other does not accept anyone new and has not done so for 6 months until it appears doomed.