Dodgy reviews

Think it might be useful to call out the suspicious reviews. Most of the HOD ones seem legit to me. The one that has popped up today for ‘tantric massage’ is highly questionable. Looks like it’s been written by a woman also.

Yes i have seen it,it does look iffy.

Track down garden of eden punternet profile last review is genuine,the 3 before that are shit.Most likely wrote by the parlour itself.Its a Birmingham parlour.

The problem with a thread like this,geezers can leave comments making accusations that genuine reviews are fake.

I do think if the admin of pnet have suspicions some reviews are dodgy they should remove them.

I think there should also be a list of service providers on that no reports list so punters dont waste time writing them out,just for it not to be published on the site.

Would also be great if there was list of agencies and parlours caught writing themselves fake reviews.

I didn’t say fake I said dodgy
For example I can call the Lutterworth duo review out
I have seen Holly around 10 times
She’s in her 40s
Fairly fit but for me no more than a 6/10
Was always fairly tame I saw her
But if the other woman is similar I certainly wouldn’t want to replicate it
It may be that the guy is a stud and got on well with them
But he hasn’t mentioned ages
Holly is I think around 43 from memory (one of the other SPa told me)
Which is fine but he should make that clear in his review
The idea of this thread is to call our reviews that don’t make sense
Also he should be clearer about pricing because as far as I knew Victoria House was 80 per sp per 30 mins for GFE plus a door fee



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 15/02/2019 09:24 by modelfucker.

I’ve got a feeling Holly might even be close to 50. I’ll find out next time I see the SP that works with her. I said 43 but I have a strange feeling it’s 49!!! Sure there’s a market for that but that reviewer makes it sound very different. Holly looks good for her age. But out of the circa 1000 ladies I have seen she’s in the lower half...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15/02/2019 09:40 by modelfucker.

I am pretty sure some punters make it clear to SPs and establishments they review to get better service or priority bookings or even a tenner off here and there. That’s not my style and I would avoid establishments or ladies that rolled like that. When I once complained to HOD they offered me a free booking which I didn’t take. Same happened with one of the Russian agencies.

modelfucker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I didn’t say fake I said dodgy
> For example I can call the Lutterworth duo review
> out
> I have seen Holly around 10 times
> She’s in her 40s
> Fairly fit but for me no more than a 6/10
> Was always fairly tame I saw her
> But if the other woman is similar I certainly
> wouldn’t want to replicate it
> It may be that the guy is a stud and got on well
> with them
> But he hasn’t mentioned ages
> Holly is I think around 43 from memory (one of the
> other SPa told me)
> Which is fine but he should make that clear in his
> review
> The idea of this thread is to call our reviews
> that don’t make sense
> Also he should be clearer about pricing because as
> far as I knew Victoria House was 80 per sp per 30
> mins for GFE plus a door fee

I know what you ment.This thread is in good faith.Suspious,dodgy and fake it all boils down to the same thing to me.I once had some accusations and lies threw at me,it was forum mainly used by northern geezers.Its all water under the bridge now.

I dont really care about them or that forum

If u mean ukpunting I find them incredibly annoying almost every review I left on there was ridiculed
Partly cos they don’t like accepting people have money to spend
Also due to them I stayed away from HOD for a year or so because they don’t represent it fairly
But I usually go back and torment them every so often
It’s like a cult basically that place

Ukpunting only really want adultwork reviews but then when people get scammed or worse they again just say ‘told u so’
Wtf

modelfucker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If u mean ukpunting I find them incredibly
> annoying almost every review I left on there was
> ridiculed
> Partly cos they don’t like accepting people have
> money to spend
> Also due to them I stayed away from HOD for a year
> or so because they don’t represent it fairly
> But I usually go back and torment them every so
> often
> It’s like a cult basically that place

No it wasn't ukpunting.They can be brutal at times but atleast you know where you stand with them.I realised ages ago its not worth reviewing escorts who charge over 300 you just get a load of stick for booking girls at that rate,usually comments like "you're a mug punter" or "throwing your money round like its jizz" rofl.

Well fuck em it was my money i can do what i like with it,i dont tell other people what they should or shouldn't do.

modelfucker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ukpunting only really want adultwork reviews but
> then when people get scammed or worse they again
> just say ‘told u so’
> Wtf

Yeah i know.

Aston Driller Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> modelfucker Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > If u mean ukpunting I find them incredibly
> > annoying almost every review I left on there
> was
> > ridiculed
> > Partly cos they don’t like accepting people
> have
> > money to spend
> > Also due to them I stayed away from HOD for a
> year
> > or so because they don’t represent it fairly
> > But I usually go back and torment them every so
> > often
> > It’s like a cult basically that place
>
> No it wasn't ukpunting.They can be brutal at times
> but atleast you know where you stand with them.I
> realised ages ago its not worth reviewing escorts
> who charge over 300 you just get a load of stick
> for booking girls at that rate,usually comments
> like "you're a mug punter" or "throwing your money
> round like its jizz" rofl.
>
> Well fuck em it was my money i can do what i like
> with it,i dont tell other people what they should
> or shouldn't do.

Yuh

modelfucker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If u mean ukpunting I find them incredibly
> annoying almost every review I left on there was
> ridiculed
> Partly cos they don’t like accepting people have
> money to spend
> Also due to them I stayed away from HOD for a year
> or so because they don’t represent it fairly
> But I usually go back and torment them every so
> often
> It’s like a cult basically that place



Yeah i like to go back to this other forum every so often

For a bit of fun rofl

Better that people provide Punternet and/or UKP reviews rather than just living off other people's efforts...

I’m suspicious of the reviewer ‘Mark De Zorro’ and I suspect it’s penned by the same person who did some reviews under an Aussie type of character ‘Bogdan’ I think it was.

charlieton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Better that people provide Punternet and/or UKP
> reviews rather than just living off other people's
> efforts...

Well every time I go on UKP am reminded of how herd mentality works. And I’m one of the more energetic reviewers here. :-/

To be honest, I take reviews with a large grain of salt. Either that, or a lot of people are very, very easily satisfied. When I look at a random page of reviews on this site, roughly 95% of them are positive. In my experience, about 50% of punts are good. So either people are scared to write honest reviews, aren't willing to share their real experience of bad punts, or don't know what a good punt is. But learning who to avoid is just as useful as learning who to see.

Im sorry but its completely unfair and uncalled for to call out a review on an escort on here. You were not there, you dont know that punter, how do you know what his usual writing style is. Its just so wrong to do this on an open forum and make others view someones reviews as potentially dodgy with no evidence for it other than you think it doesnt sound like a guy? Psychic now are you? If someone thinks a review is dodgy they should report it to admin and let admin look and decide. Not give unproven opinion over as potential facts. Please remember that that could actually affect someones bookings in an adverse way just because "you think". You thinking that doest mean you have the right to caste doubt on someones integrity either as an sp or another ss.

Aston Driller Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I do think if the admin of pnet have suspicions
> some reviews are dodgy they should remove them.
>
> I think there should also be a list of service
> providers on that no reports list so punters dont
> waste time writing them out,just for it not to be
> published on the site.
>
> Would also be great if there was list of agencies
> and parlours caught writing themselves fake
> reviews.

You raise some valid points.

We agree with the site founder's philosophy that if there is no hard evidence that a review is fake but only suspicion then it should be left online so the readers may make up their own minds about it. Leaving them online also allows a pattern to emerge if further suspect reviews are published, which may then become that hard evidence.

When someone begins the review submission, if the contact details they enter match the no reviews list then a warning is shown, they can then decide to continue or not. This does of course rely on an exact match.

We are probably not going to publish a list of providers with fake reviews. It has happened in the past that someone has submitted many obviously fake reviews about a competitor in order to get them excluded from this site. This we believe is very rare but we are reluctant to compound an injustice.

---

PunterNet UK Admin Team