Too many escorts now are just dumb

In better times I used to think of escorts as being very savvy, with the ability to make a heck of a lot of money. Most women wouldn't do what they do. But I could see why some would. Even two clients a day could bring in £300 a day, £2,000 a week, and £8,000 a month, tax free. Three clients a day and the income soars. Take away rental costs and that's still a huge amount of money. But these were a different calibre of women, bright, attractive and very intelligent, and I met plenty like that. Very different to most of those around now. I think many now, quite frankly, are a bit thick, a bit dumb. In no particular order:

They use AW with no phone numbers on display and just that email nonsense. Do they get any customers at all?

If you get a number to phone they can be abrupt and sound ill tempered, which ends it there for me.

Their profiles are often in hopelessly mangled English. OK, it's not their first language, but you'd think they could get a proper script written and use it all the time.

They use totally fake pictures. More and more guys should just walk away. I go less now but I think I'll just start doing that.

They make no effort and give crap service, as more and more clients testify. So no repeat visits, maybe bad reviews. And it seems they don't give a shit.

I know there's no such thing as an Escorts Union or whatever where these things could be addressed sensibly. No there's certainly nothing like that. But all in all many of those around at present, and of course there are exceptions, couldn't be doing more to run down the escort industry if they tried. I've already said I'm phasing out my visits. I'm sure I'm not alone. The bright and savvy money makers, and I went back to see some several times, spending £600 in a fortnight on one lovely Polish lady, are all gone. The current batch, and I say this with all due regret, mainly get too much wrong. As I say, they either don't care, or they just can't think straight. No disrespect intended, but what else can you say?

Even the top escorts would struggle with 2 clients a day.
Plenty display phone numbers.
Do reverse image searches.
Question them about the services listed vs what is actually offered;.
Read reviews on here and other places.
You can do you own homework before taking the plunge, ain`t rocket science, if you do your homework before forking out on a new TV, do the same with a prostitute.

I don't need advice, I've been at it long enough and with all due respect you're talking bullshit. I don't need to do reverse images because the pictures are obviously fake, as I said if you get a phone number they can be abrupt and not answer any questions, and your "homework" theory is cobblers. If a bird turns up, puts up a glam photo with no name, there's fuck all homework you can do. It's not "rocket science" to understand that. You're obviously an eager newcomer to this kind of thing.

And they're escorts, not prostitutes, see a post below so you can understand that.

Not a newcomer by a long chalk, i know how to spot the scammers, fakes and bullshitters a mile off.
Reverse image searching is a tool, might not be obvious it`s a fake image, but it helps in finding if it`s been nicked from elsewhere.

What`s the difference ?

Chloe summed it up in the post below I referred to, easy to find. Read it, learn, and don't call escorts "prostitutes". Whatever the shortcomings of some, and there are plenty, at least show the women involved the most basic respect.

Service provider is a more accurate term than escort.

Well that's fair enough. "Service provider" would I'm sure cause offence to no one. A good enough description.

All amounts to the same thing regardless of the terminology unless an offence is committed under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 whereby the correct legal terminology is used.

Doesn`t bother me if i`m referred to as a customer, service user, client or punter - still paying for sex at the end of the day.

Quote

In better times I used to think of escorts as being very savvy, with the ability to make a heck of a lot of money.

That's the crux of it isn't it?

You assume that they want to work in traditional sexwork. Everyone, even the "dumb" girls know how to get 15 callers a day if they want to...they don't want to. Why on earth would they?

Average girls were charging 120GBP per hour 25 years ago and by the looks of it, prices have not gone up much. The internet now provides a million different revenue streams for girls. Ask yourself Nesslad, would you rather put yourself in danger and have sex with 2 potential smelly weirdos for 300 quid, or would you rather sit behind a screen and run10 grifts a day for the same,- if not more money?

Just catering for the watch and wank brigade.
Not a replacement service, more of an additional one that didn`t exist in the past.

If blokes want to spend £1.50 a minute watching her get her tits out on camera, that`s up to them.
I`d sooner spend that sort of money in the real world.

Quote
Captaincaveman69
Just catering for the watch and wank brigade.
Not a replacement service, more of an additional one that didn`t exist in the past.

If blokes want to spend £1.50 a minute watching her get her tits out on camera, that`s up to them.
I`d sooner spend that sort of money in the real world.

Watch and wank can be lucrative. More than that the streams, not even any need for tits, or even any flesh. Anyone can vtube with a 3d anime avatar- parasocial relationships.

Are you captain69 from the c69 review site? That's been going over 20 years now right?.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2023 22:24 by OGShadylady.

Actually in the UK we do have a couple of unions. Union of sex workers under the GMB I believe. However I think girls are safer when they are listed with a decent and genuine Agency. They at least then have a first line of defense. Too many lunatics out there!

Chloe x

Also this representative organisation that`s been going 48 years
[prostitutescollective.net]