No. 66952 - Published 26 Aug 2006
Review of Louise of London Retreat Fetish /Mistress Services, London
Details of Visit
| Author: | jim4 |
|---|---|
| Location 2: | Earls Court |
| Type of Visit: | Incall |
| Date and Time of Visit: | 24.08.06 Evening |
| Duration of Visit: | 30min |
| Amount Paid: | 100 |
| Recommended: | No |
Details of Service Provider
| Profile Name: | London Retreat Fetish /Mistress Services - click to view profile in a new window |
| Website: | http://www.londonretreat.co.uk |
| Phone: | 07774643730 |
| Phone: | 07774643730 |
Live Cam Girls
The Premises
Very well described on punternet
The Lady
as in the pictures
The Story
Not good at all, it was her second day(so she says!) at the LR and he is very very inexperienced . I believe she is much more suited to the massage parlour scene.
The point I want to make is to you the management, why are clinets not told that ladies are inexperienced and learning the ropes?, why are we charged 100 quid for this inexperience? why are we not asked about our service?.
Perhaps you should have them shadow more experienced ladies until they are ready to go alone or chagre less money until they are ready.
Furthermore, Tina was on reception and guess what?, she never even asked how the service was, she was just not interetsed. When I arrived she was on the phone to her mates and yes when I left she was still on the phone to her mates. You would expect she would like some feedback on news girls, after all this is a customer service environment you work in.
I have been more times than I remember now, and really wish Penny and Victoria would return, the standards are slipping very very quickly.
Are you going to respond to this? I expect not? I imagine you say well what the hell it is just the industry and some other stupid punter will take my slot next time.
The point I want to make is to you the management, why are clinets not told that ladies are inexperienced and learning the ropes?, why are we charged 100 quid for this inexperience? why are we not asked about our service?.
Perhaps you should have them shadow more experienced ladies until they are ready to go alone or chagre less money until they are ready.
Furthermore, Tina was on reception and guess what?, she never even asked how the service was, she was just not interetsed. When I arrived she was on the phone to her mates and yes when I left she was still on the phone to her mates. You would expect she would like some feedback on news girls, after all this is a customer service environment you work in.
I have been more times than I remember now, and really wish Penny and Victoria would return, the standards are slipping very very quickly.
Are you going to respond to this? I expect not? I imagine you say well what the hell it is just the industry and some other stupid punter will take my slot next time.
This Lady's Reviews
| Number | Author | Published | Recommended |
|---|---|---|---|
| 103033 | yankeeyk | 29 Mar 2011 | YES |
| 102251 | ramon17 | 7 Feb 2011 | YES |
| 98661 | jimmyredcab | 7 Jul 2010 | YES |
| 94489 | PhillUpNow | 26 Nov 2009 | YES |
| 88254 | Corblimey92 | 13 Feb 2009 | YES |
| 81061 | TornadoTony | 18 Mar 2008 | YES |
| 75421 | Welshy | 12 Jul 2007 | YES |
| 73168 | clayton | 23 Apr 2007 | YES |
| 71028 | badgerboyz | 23 Jan 2007 | YES |
| 70797 | londonricky | 17 Jan 2007 | YES |
| 70728 | horney as hell | 11 Jan 2007 | YES |
| 69004 | williamtell | 9 Nov 2006 | YES |
| 68678 | nickcummings | 28 Oct 2006 | YES |
| 68107 | maze | 8 Oct 2006 | YES |
| 68104 | figleaf | 8 Oct 2006 | YES |
| 66952 | jim4 | 26 Aug 2006 | NO |
Total Reviews: 16
Recommended: 15, 93.8%
Not Recommended: 1, 6.3%
Neutral: 0, 0%
NOTE: This list consists only of reviews linked to this profile and where the lady's name matches exactly. Reviews in which her name is spelled differently, or duo reviews with another lady, will not appear in this list. If two different ladies have worked under the same name at different times the results will still show all reviews where the name matches.
Watch Local Girls Live on Cam